| Show ANTI POLYGAMY RESOLUTION RESOLUTION I IN CALIFORNIA O A LEGISLATURE GIL I l Feb 34 bl Uro Grove L I of tiM ai whose h Japanese bill hi I aroused Ih the antagonism of et I in III the 1 lu lure late lat this eving a joint I lion aMI asking Congress for II a to sowed to Constitution so Ii as to I 1 I It t It nil no now I In session 1011 to join jin I ii I lb The measure IaN 11 i traduced at the request of Mr Ht r V or of Loa I Angela pl lIt r the W rn ill Is I colony n ot of boat about 1008 1 mona at Bulte I hi Pits Mats tat and mady are re 01 California The resolution h Iti fu tuu I is Ie a fellows TT 1 or Ii from I JI wU loa recently II mad by br the senate el 01 the Un United halos and net that 1 phil exists III hi certain places In U to ta t utu td kg tile the several vera I stats ta Tho Th ot po polygamy I ii nasally rall ts II the people ot of flailed 1 list sod t there h Ia I fee far tM the mere n nor thereof or b by I iliff Ih the subject I sm t III and nd a and at t the ull tUlle t ah I tat Ih I hi right I a and iii It II own I to and d 41 low W M be It 11 v M ly Ihl the ill aen 11 a at Ih that bt and heichi I is t I 0 UI flu v f t of t the Ii s it II I for th II II log of d to In to 10 tile lb r II I I IId MIt wh rob i shall 11 Iw isil w t toe b i curt ur I I i hr i h I h i I III U I i ii r I Iata states ata n of the III n II 1 II sup I isag i sag u r it Il I 1 to 10 i 10 Ihl t Ii Ii n pp I ii t 1 iii h by III I he or of I his hIli or an i t I iSi III ThiS I II Iii i r b a I Ii 10 Ii LCt I hd 4 t ii cpis PI r to toI I I h ho nat 1111 hu house r 1 I ut r th the stil tn 1 Ih thc several Of t 11 otIa I this hili Ial |
