Show BOND ISUE E IN COUP GOU RT Action of and amI Trust C Is Js and SI Tho supreme court has under le advise or tho Utah Savings Trust against t the tho mu municipal company e l ny bond Issue dho he case came up for fol h ar lc was argued Attorney Franklin D Richards appear InE for the thc protestants ts while II H J and P J r Daly Daly city db attorney arid and respective respectively ly Iy ct Briefs had been Jeen submitted by on both sides The he contention cont of ot plaintiff was WI to the tho effect bond Issue was invalid for CO two reasons tho c first being that notice noU of ot the special election had not b given tand Ind tho polling places pJ e had b d not n be n designated de c Sec Secondly that there was a discrepancy pancy between the purposes of the bond Is 15 Issue sue suc as uE stated In the thc published Intention tion lon and tho ordinance lanc governing the proposition tho nt stating that the net revenues of ot thil th water system tem lem should constitute a IL pinking fund for fOI thc pa ment of bonds and Interests while the ordinance sets forth furth that a i tax shall bo levied each cadi year to 10 pay the thc Interest on tho bonds and to pro provide vide Ilo I fund for tho of the th bonds within 20 years eri The Tho city attorney contended that sufficient notice had hll given by b pub publication in dally daly papers and that the tho par papers had time after time announced amio tho election as lS news new items Ho le ex expressed pressed thc tho belief beler that th ro was no conflict in I tho minds of voters as to how the thc bonds should be redeemed rol |