| Show NEARLY A fiGHT O OVER ER A TRANSfER Ira L Reynolds of Ogden Insists On Getting His Gray GrayS Trip Slip S PASSENGERS ERS TAKE T KE SIDES llIs III flights When Conductor s Coot Other Made because e Ira Lester Iester Reynolds secre secretary tary of the lie Ogden L r club was re ye refused V fused fueX a n transfer on tho thio Colder CaIdOr Cald r park lark lIne lino last nIght there came caine near n ar to being a n pitched he 1 fight In the tho car be between between tween lw n two of ot the ne company and a It number Of r passengers rs nod and nn 1 at nt least ono one Snit Salt Lake visitor r left loti tho the city elt with an all opinion that would not look well In print paid his hla hl faro fare at nt 1125 p m at atto to conductor number 63 He Ho declares d that he ho asked lIked for a and tho the conductor declares that lib ho did not nut hear him hilt was 11 loath to 10 quietly letting the th conductor get aWay with without out delivering so 0 ho forcibly laid hands hundE handson on tho thu uniformed man unit and renewed lila demand nd 1 z did not pot hoar hear you V a trans transfer fer when you staid paid your faro litre tl e is in what passengers give gle us as tint correct form torm of oe the thc conversation r I have havo paid laiI III my money I J Bin um en entitled entitled entitled titled to Ic a 1 transfer I demanded il It In indue duo due form torm and I 1 Intend 1 to get It Is 18 the tho answer from fr m Reynolds Well Im Fm sorry but if It I give glo you youil youa ii il transfer now noi I will be ba liable to sus suspension pension for five fie days dayn WHAT MANAGER lo SAID Reynolds had Mil read In the Salt Sait Lake papers tho the authorized statement from General Manager Jos Jon Wells that tho the it cilia nd n r w our money mone rule iUle Will was meant only as na a con coil convenience md and that conductors L were un under der Instructions to exercise Ix their Judg Jung Judgment bent ment und and apply the rulo rule with common tommo commonsense l sense and discretion n nC CONDUCTORS C SIDE Ho JIo therefore further proceeded ed d to object ob oh object sect to tho conductor At this i a I second 1 e boarded b the thi thiL tar car L land and backed up lip thiS tho assertions Of thu conductor If It I 1 IU ii it I little bIgger bt ner nerI I would ouM whip the of ot you ou and an 1 If It ItI I was w saS a Suit Il ota otin visitor Id do It Il were yere the tile final worth or of the tho controversy Several S passengers to s e tho the company for flee llva cents nad damages to bring matters to a n headon head oti the exact nature of in III given out conductors in I I regard to issuing Ib ter Another complaint of the tho same kind Comes omes from a n local party who declares 11 that Ihal to him also conductors havo have de defended d fended d n it to give transfers un unless less lees demanded In III a IL loud voice oleo and with Ith Instant r the moment ii iL i nickel Is hr paid p by b saying t that tho lore fore oro have havo ner tl on all them that live days clays of oC Would follow toll ow every In which they give a transfer under unde other conditions WHAT RULES JUtE ARK ARKA ArtEA A 4 reporter who asked Il ked a II con conductor conductor ductor for fill the Iho exact nature of ot his or orders tIers ders said that Unit hoy wera W N posted In tho the car horns and gave absolutely no ills to tho the conductor Ho lIe hall had for eor further personal instructions alt had been Informed by b Mr Ir Man Ian Manning ning that the tile company lII was under jio io 10 obligations to give ge transfers at all alt If IC ICIl It Il wish to antI and that ho was not notto no noto notto to turn back oven even ee from trem tho next pas In passenger to give a transfer when It was lIe not asked 1 for tor at otter once Also MSo that thit five It days of suspension in woUld result from his riving a It transfer out of ot f order that thai the tho company would woul fully tully back up his refusals ref nals An 11 Interview wIth lIh Jon Jos Wells general manager has hils been published In the tho In which lie be IIa h li denied il that this thin tho the Of or pro procedure c and the tue rule rulo wo meant to bo ho liberally construed 1 and was merely for or a n convenience |
