Show LANGOON LANGDON AND RUEF DIFFER Difference Practically Amounts To the Passing of the Lie Between Them THEIR FIRST FIST CLASH IN COURT District Attorney Said Sull Cerium Defend hilts ante Jim JI I Which He lie 0 Strongly Denied Velle San Sait Francisco Jan Jai 30 What vir tir amounted to tl the time of or iho the lie le between Abraham und and DIet 1 t Ally Atty Aty William II H occurred 11 In Judge department of oC tin the su dU superior perlor court ourt this morning morninG when denounced us as lS untrue tho the statement nt Just made by h the tho district Altai alo nay n that counsel tom for Patrick Calhoun und and uld the other United defendants had hut had dealings with wIh Incidentally it was waa Wa tho the first verbal clash In open alIen court between and flue Rie personally antI and Indicated somewhat the Intensity Inton lt of or the hitherto suppressed and ald resentment bo Lie Lp tween tIme the district attorney and antI iho former political boss boa since silco tho limo annul annulment ment by b tho former of or time the Immunity contra rt Half an ami l hour holl later latem Intel In II Judge court coun after aCtor th tIm passage of or sent IO upon on ti a it charge of or extortion to Lu which ho pleaded guilty guity but practically call caI cally nullified by tho the decision doc lOI of or tho thC appellate court In II the Ito Schmaltz case tase In l Hue dictated a 1 statement l to Iho tue news newspaper paper men mell In which he lie again denounced ed cd tho LImo district attorneys statement ru u false Calse as well weli wol as us tho tim story published In Ina InI ina a I local paper this tills morning about en cn alleged plot on tho the part hart of or Huer to 10 10 escape which ho hc declared to ho bo so no ridiculous that oven even ono one In II my m pros pres present ent serious situation refrain from laughing at nt It Ithon When hon I I r former Mayor Mn or Eugmo Eullo E B Patrick Calhoun president of or the tho United Railroads and Ind the oth other other th ther er officials of ot that street railway lys ys tem charged with bribery In connection ion tion ton with wih the tho obtaining of or a n trolly franchise appeared before Judge Law Lawlor Lawlor lor br to havo their cases ca es sot set State Fon ien n ator George B D on behalf of r secured another extension of time lIne until Saturday morning moring upon the showing mado that Henry Ach lead lag Ing InS counsel for Ruef Ruet would not re vu return turn from Los Angeles until today und amid nd that associate counsel had hod been se so secured cured subject to Achs approval Without our consent so tar far as ns our cases are concerned Interposed A A AMoore AMoore Moore sr chief counsel for Calhoun who opposed tho the continuance of or the cases CIC of the United Railways s defond ants antH antl along with wih that of or Huer Moore then suited stated that ho would servo no notice noice ice tice upon tho district attorney that tho the defense would again agIn avail oal Itself of or the constitutional provision of or trial with wih withIn In 60 days s waived on Dec 9 on condition that trial should begin early In February I Chief counsel for tor the street railway magnate then took strong exception to LO toa LOa toa a statement In a 0 local paper this lila thi morn mornIng Into Ing sarcastically referred to by b Moore as l a 0 tactical organ of or the prosecution tion which recited as a proof of alleged ed dealings with wih the United Rail Railroads Hul roads defendants that Earl Rogers Roser cf Ct roars counsel for the defense had during the thc cond trial of L Ford openly congratulated upon his refusal to take the witness stand and andIn andon nn on In Incident last week when Stanley Moore also of or counsel for tor Calhoun had greeted flue Ruef henrt heartily and con conversed conversed conversed versed with wih him In court I J want to give glo notice said Moore now that Mr r Ruef Is out of or his for tor former mer mar quarters and Is In tho thio county count Jail Jai where there thoro are arc Ire not supposed to Ln be b peepholes that I I or any an other atom mem member her ber bel of ot our counsel or any ny ono One of at the tho defendants for whom We WU 0 appear will twIll wi visit confer with or OT call cal upon unon Mr Ruef whenever we wo deem It necessary and Ind whenever Mr 11 Ruef will wl receive Why wo we Ho Ito 1 II Is Jointly Indicted with wih the other defendants antI and antIas as yet et el wo tO have havo had no opportunity to confer with him or oven even evon speak pek to him about tile tho tl cases CS f In imi which ho Ito In II a joint defendant with those for tor whom I lap ap appear appear pear The Tue luculent Incident referred to when my 0 myson son pon Stanley walked over to Mr Runt Ruef Bad and Ild asked n him a as to 10 the setting of or these cases case In which ho hI Is Isi i in t l 1 n V I unit hero J In JIn open olen court curt Why h should we not bo I permitted to speak peak to him 7 That would bo be b new in interposed interposed interposed DI tAtt Langdon It I Is not the first time that these those defendants ttO have havo communicated with wih Mr and I presume It will twill wi occur again That Is not true rime and you know it itH I itIs Is H not hotly retorted retort d flue from his sent ent In a hot pow pew OW on ott 01 tho the left lert hand Imand side aide of tho Temple auditorium Wo Yc know different replied Lang don 0 on You do 10 not declared Roof I L know bettor ettor was tho the district nt at attorneys rejoinder as I ho h got Kot up walked Into tho time chambers of or Judge Lawlor loiter appeared In Judge udo Dunnes Inel court where tho lie passing of or sentence was continued ono one week Detective wn Burns Bur asserts n erts that hu he bos limm located Alel er Lathan Lathun chauffeur for Abraham Abrham Huer an aim UI Im tin Important witness In the tho who mysteriously disappear 1 cases several days ago though ho lie s to the time present of or tho the missing mon man |