| Show BRYAN AGAINST SUPREME COURT GOURT Cant Understand How it Reached Its Decision in the Dis Discrimination Discrimination Discrimination crimination Case DISSENTS WITH DISSENTERS I I I f In I U iI Company CHili IU 1811 II 1111 Arid Anil Holmes Jiin S William J Un liry ry ryun un all today visited till lu lobby of tlC the lilt with tell members Ills HII at ut tnt ion hul mig t taI led to lh th HU court holding that hat n ii ImuS hUR n a might ll ht to tim tull a n man O hue lio IB Is a mu member of oC a it labor union lillian mitt he hue dictated d teul the following statement to t the Ilia ed ProM I nut not utah lind opportunity to read tIme llio decision The subject In iii oho of fiC vital and anul I by h what course of or tho the of ur time till court COlt the llio A Is II a n creature uru of law lau It hi no lights except ii II it by II the Die In u tl mint moult not muot be l coil willi w Ith tho thu natural itt ruh man titan for rem man intuit Willi created to cariT out lulL a i divine pur vur purpose pose hut tho corporation enjoys many rIght Is and n mud which are aie denied Ita I to 10 tIme tho Individual mud and It cannot claim tho Iho lIlon of nt any natural or In rights Tins Time h lOIr that creates a mi corporation can resti let It restrain 11 It control It II and Congress has hall Idea avy ny nl Powers 1 In lit with corporations corporation In iii at o tar far PS as they tile engage In III Interstate commerce Whatever tony may he Iw the thu th rights ot or an tin tinI Individual I nil I toil In I mm dealing I hg I Ii other ot hem hull Indi Individuals I the tho lY hits till the I lu to determine ho llio I condition amid I lion upon 1011 ii which ichu Il a corporation I ion can eta ii exist and hut do business anil GoneK can ClUI fix the terms tt upon which a it 1 stain RIa 10 corporation inn call ell II In Interstate i iThe The Time union Is a lawful x a and nut If a it man can call bo Lie bc he b lauso nuI ho to t IL a labor union by hy bythe h hythe the imo sante logic ho lie can tan bo ho h Uncharged If ho belongs to a It political parly to the thu or to a I hutch church which the employer la Iii I prejudiced diced Followed to Its Il logIcal conclusion sion the Ihl principle laid down by the court us ns I understand the decision would enable the corporation to hot ot 11 tt solf up UI an OR a IL dictator In III regard to the habits thoughts and und convictions of Its os on any nn und antI every subject Tho The fact that two of ot the tue justices havo hino dissented enables mo ole to lo dissent from the conclusion of ot th Ih thu i majority without disrespect to the ability or high powers of or those who vho have havo given what I regard rc as us an erroneous construction to time the Constitution The rue house committee on election of or president and vice Iee president held a II today lola and decided to hear heul Mr Mi 1 Brynn on Thursday morning next III In support of or the Belmont Helmont bill hili which makes Il compulsory the time publication of oC campaign contributions by amount und end name |
