Show AN OPINION B BY SUPREME COURT Appeal in the Case or oF F Garcia Company is Di Dic missed I STATUS OF CITY COURT CASES Not he be iI Itie UI I 1 to III oo 11 More rite fhe court hag Imas banded down Lou an opinion dismissing time Iho im the fa c of f 1 Garcia Co I vi 0 John 1 amid 1100 delia dolln lug time status jalU ot of In inthe the Iha cit y court 10 It th tile la court Jurl and then to the rho that hiM such sucho 1101 Lu bu to the thc oui IOUI t thu lii In IIII Ili III distrIct sash amount IU U IW q 11 II Iii tails race cac iii thu cli court In fl favor 1101 or of for I Ith Ito to th the district In that court to 1 us as lit In too to m lit Jf 0 Ua by the cout I ci 1 had no of action 1110 then tJ t the court oun The s tr Nr th that to 1 Il the tite cooer WitS more maIo IO jOl It J iJ ble to the Jim w tu 1 the Ihu opinIon ot of the Ia wu su r court holds hold thit in III IL 1 tL orl III tim LII rity court amounts to toH H ot o nor 1 it is In not to th court orders the appeal II am title case cUle Another Was by the Iho court yesterday otter after boon In 1 tire judgment ot of time the boy boyer er court ourt I is o rm d In the case calle ot of otH i It H Smith appellant vms 11 Al 1 Time action teams brought In Weber couitt tO tl recover for or alleged trespass It was that ot II olon along lbs line h his property properly nn end that ot of gilt Injure time ten c anti trees In the mover lower court It wn ova held that the ditch oas un oil round ground and oud that had hod imo 10 cau cause e eor or hr Till This judgment lIt I Is now itt If b by the supreme court |