| Show I Utah Urges o Yes I Vote on Wheat Utah Wheat Referendum Committee in a meeting at atthe atthe I I the Newhouse Hotel Saturday again emphasized the import import- importance importance ance for Utah wheat farmers to vote yes In the referendum urn um on May This committee is a memo mem- member ber of the National Wheat Re- Re Referendum Referendum I Committee and is comprised of most of all the major farm organizations and the National Wheat Growers Association with a member member- membership ship of over Mr Glen chairman of the committee said This Is with with- without out a doubt the best program ever presented to the wheat growers of the coun- coun country country try IN URGING all farmers to vote M Glenn said farmers must make their decision based bas bas- based ed on the present wheat pro pro- program gram The forces urging a no vot ar are quick to criticize criticize cize and denounce the propOs propOs- propOsed proposed ed wheat program but still fail to say what they feel I should be done about the sit sit sit- situation I and suggest no alternative tive he sai said I Defeat tu tae program and Congress will develop a bet bet- better ter program was their only positive attack Contrary to I thesE people say and according to Senator Milton Young R-ND R Senator El El- El Ellender lender chairman of the Senate Agricultural Committee and Representative Cooley chair chair- chairman man of the House Agricultural al Committee and many oth- oth others others ers there will be no new wheat legislation this year Mr Glenn said Wheat farmers need thIs I program because farm pro pro- programs grams in the past have not solved the surplus problem the Voluntary Land Retire Retire- Retirement Retirement ment Act did not solve the surplus wheat the problem Voluntary Turkey Program was a complete failure the chairman pointed out WHEAT GROWERS should realize that this program is strictly economical The plain simple economic fact Is on a national average if you want 1 wheat vote no If you want 2 wheat vote yes Mr Glenn urged We recommend that every wheat producer go to hIs office and find out exactly what this program means to him in dollars and cents he said The committee issued the following statement We will not lose any of our freedom we will simply man man- manage manage age our own production We will tryout try out the certificate plan if it works out alright we will use it again for 1965 but if it does not prove sat sat- satisfactory satisfactory the law already pro pro- provides provides vides for another referendum to correct any errors we may the make nations nation's wheat far far- farmers farmers mers cannot afford the million loss oss that the error of a no vote would cost THE UT UTAH WHEAT Refer Refer- Referendum Committee said that a yes vote on May 21 can be bea bea a farmers farmer's most important and most profitable days day's work for the entire year |
