Show 1 U Uy illy a decision by It th II the Illinois P rt a lady has hag au Men ben aa t for tor having been taen h be gre rte ou ouI by a stroll oar car ue tir hII The Tb Th lady got cot IUM r from tro ls th e com company company pany panyA A to le th vb report porta she gho had haC paid h 11 r tare far on another oUt ear Car CarI and held a I Tree The oar ear aba lb boarded board was waa crowded she and th the tho wader n waa we w wand fray her hand and Maw baw w o off C th I pat fIAt i form forai oh h had hid no a deep doen montary taIT evidence to 0 prove prey va that are aho had par paid her IC and a told lOW the tho conductor that tNt oh h had had haul a twofer transfer she h was w tarred forced trim from r the tho oar sad and eI th the conductor clad Iw hr lad fbi Tho did der not met te the fact thou that tar ire had bad been pus paW but n nt that t Iho lb measure maur of 01 damage wa w was I The e Jury jU rendered 4 a 11 vet ver verdict diet dict In la damages dams n This Thin ft judgment l I is sue au by il I th I supreme court C which wl M any ay r of a public sorrier are Pr omitted entitled tn to t treatment ai ahi 1 it tt I U rL 1 f if f Ih I r to In n nII are e ein Ura in II It ti give v this hi s rl rI of If treat ni in III to tt iaM ora oraW W b lM Hit f by a a rasp rul are ora I urto sal u d congenial and rot I e greet great deal of at pats under Her I J i JI I I I One l n no In I a o while f MI mt t to general generel nral rule ruto ru I Ih li no nn notice tice laid Such Mch h M a will ut Brav raT etel eael I ly If It lh to rule ru of d T hw law laid lak dawn br hr b tin Illinois court I la nor more 10 frequent I l |