| Show CHARGED I WILFUL PERJURY Argued Truth of Orchards Story And Said Defense Dare CareCa Call Pettibone DARROW DABROW SPRANG INTO ACTION 4 White to 10 the Lips He Shouted The Statement is False and Counsel Knows It Itro f t i to ro Which Huntey Replied j Counsel Coun el Says Su That lie He Utters Ute s n a Deliberate I t II ji I Boise Dolle July Jilly 20 Continuing his hIss ar argument ii iH 1 mel t and analysis of ot the evidence In Inthe Inthe t the Hay Hawood wood case ese today J T II H 1 Hawley f took tool TIP up time Hie Orchard story tory of ot his hil ex os experiences P and crimInal record In Colo Coin his ills trip to Wyoming and thc tho at ut attempt tempt on tie the life lite lo of ot Fred Frail Bradley of at ofSan ofSan San SIn Francisco With the utmost delIberation tho the leading counsel for tor tho time state charged J wilful severn several wit witnesses Il nesses flosses He lie argued tho Lime truth ot of Or Orchards Orchards i ichards story ston and ond sold said that thal two t 0 men e In lit II particular might Ight have been bemi brought to contradict him Ilium lint hut that the 1110 de defense il ilease tono ease was wal afraid to produce either Pet I boise or Ot and nud ho said Adams had lean been been brought to 10 Boise Boll liam from Jail jOil In iii county In order that tIle the de 1 tenae might use ubo him huts AH as 1 a mm witness Willies White to lo the tho lips Clarence winess Harrow I Into action j i The rite statement Is false and anti counsel knows It I h ho hawley Hawey took a n step tcp closer to the tho do de I r tense table and shaking s his linger close chose to Darrows face fUCO said nl When hen counsel Y says ays hood that ho utters titters a deliberate false fitle It The Tho charged chor cd with f danger Sheriff Sherin looked up UI alert mid hiss his hIl deputy dellIt drew closer clo er In but hut Judge Wood with wih a IL 1 sharp com corn command mand mend ansi and insistent warning patched up u u u temporary peace Mr 11 argument this morning was nan 11 lacking In all aU attempts at oratory I It was 1 a n dispassionate review of ot tho evidence with 1 h bold denunciation of ot the lh method of counsel and testimony at of Ii witnesses for tile the defense HAWLEYS ARGUMENT Continuing today iso tho opening argument meat ment for tOl or tho state tata In tile tho tlC case of Wil VIl William WI liam ham D I which after two months and n II halt of hearing la Is about to t ii bo be submitted to 10 tho IY James II U HI chief prosecutor oa his attention la LS t Urn lii aliened Red attempt lo to wreck a IL truism train on OIl the SIlL I l lor t Cripple Creek railroad II This WIll one Olic of the lh Indents Incidents of ot the thc Colorado Colordo labor troubles testified to by y larry Harry I Orchard 1 This camo cause out aLit In Orchards testimony soul said Mr 11 hut html it was absolutely Immaterial tonal to tho e Issue hero here involved But tho defense hau taken Dili t Ii im Incident and Inel fill ii has hams tried d to build up out of or It a conspiracy on aim 01 this the part of or tho Ihn mIne owners against thy tho Western stern Federation of ot Miners Or Orchard Orchard chard chart admitted that thol ho h had hai reported tile the alleged attempt to detectives 11 In us Inthe the tho employ ot or time the railroad and tims th Mine Owners association The Tha de iki defense I tense has hn brought two Iwo women witness witnesses es Cs hero here to testify that they saw Or Orchard chard In of ot tho thu detectives one ono room roul on many occasions women saw ila thin man but casually over oer four foil ago Igo but they tey como come hero hor and swear positively ns as to Orchards Orchard Identity ami amito to tho number ot of hi hll Imis visits Such oil evi evidence dence d ace as that speaks for tor Itself I ATTEn AFIm MONEY MOY MONI Y Orchard undoubtedly was wal trying to 10 secure money train from all ni tho thu sources ho lie could arid and I am om not going gollE to 10 defend defond him hIm tar for his double dealing In taking money mono from frons frol both the Western Federation Felo Uon or of i MIners and the tha railroad d company I Iam am tins 11 not nt here hero to paint Harry Orchard Orcha d J In 11 anything any thin but his true truo colors There r la is but ono one claim we wc make mako for him and that Is that ha ho has hM told you u the truth f i I This Thin Thil fact has h been Indelibly fixed by b all al I i the time circumstances In this ease case Mr lr Hawley saul saM Immediately after Iter aftertime time tho Orchard j r was found again In the tho employ ot or the tho J federation Taking up tho the matter of tho thio attempt Ittem attempted t l lcd ed CLI of Peabody Mr 11 Hawley repeated much flinch of ot thu tho testimony r i 1 of or Orchard as I to the thc plans plan he ho and Stove Steve Adams laid to ia Ic kill kil tho the governor either cither by bomb or 01 with shot shotguns i guns gulls Orchards testimony was W amply corroborated counsel declared Mrs m Peabody herself taking biking the tue stand to testify to ono eisa of thu nUl mo moat t important I incidents IncIdent Tho The attorney told tol ot of GOY Coy tt Peabodys l activities In tho the Colorado i troubles trouble and declared that this tha th strong cst cit motive for far his hIe taking off or rested with the tho Western of at Minors No possible motive s said ld Mr Mi 11 Hawley could bo bl attributed d to either StOc Adams or Harry Orchard A j Y AND AT ODDS t While arguing this juts incident Mr 11 lr Haw Ilaw Hawley lay ley soon Hon un ext exciting bat bal battie balte battie tie te of at words with Clarence Karrow Durrow of oz I Ithe tho the In which untruth anti and ud deliberate falsehood were freely used d dal on al both Idos If I hl lla loy there ther was StaS WI a it worst word worl of at untruth in iii Orchards test testimony lest 1 mony many an as to the tho attempts on Got Tea Pea body ody who of oC nil all ni spell men IMI was the limo best beet s witness to I testify A man who is JA isnow now holy In Imi II the thu basement 1 of oC this 11 building u a t man who stood tood In the lisa esteem of ot lIsts tha V of nt the Western r of ot Miners Miner second l cond only to Orchard Steve Adams Tho Iho prosecution brought this I man to lo 11 so 51 1 ho hims could coull be ho le used lJ ce ill iy y the he If It It U so HO 10 desired lOL Im ri b I 1 object to that shouted Mr r Liar L sow row ro jumping to ii his hil feet It I Is la nn an 11 y absolute untruth an as counsel well itch known unit there Is no 11 urh record In 10 thus thin ou OI case e O eIf If It you soy Noy that t what I stated i IH is H an ill I untruth replied Hawley In I linger anger hood you yes yo I utter Iler a II dellenda false falsehood falsehood Mr MI renewed M Isis hla objection 4 and nc then Judge Jud o Wood WoolI moult or a hand hund Ho lie 10 saul M lie hl would the tile Jury to ihm regard nil all al mode made by hy counsel not lorils hOrl out Olt by I ii the tho evidence Par Dar row ml that counsel el li I pit front from in into rom sIlly any to tv t A I object to In ii hi Il Isis he lie 10 brought thin isis h hero hure ie for ti u tl hu Iu honor said Haw hassle Your sil If you YOI have ruled I J ask sU I that Mr Harrow Darrow be ba p i Instructed to 11 sm lt I down own A I small Mid 11 DIO It I li Im I Hi Iii tM guill Judo jade Ju that wince taunted I Ii I Then ts I im t shout tIll ti I toni r Till 5 mu nn ii I 1 have IV not flat lot eI turning At att ll tp Iq t jury Jur Adorns Ado Adai la 18 iq liero and in hd tu h Wan all brought br ug t tInto Into court eUri Urt shown to In you ou U ilia I R P In 10 fl this thU room the tho th i Ho Uc Hoto Ucto to tho mn by y counsel counci that tho the facts MO t not nn nil s I t have related them WHY WAS pt 1 NOT or orI CALLED I There Thero Is tI Just jutt one oM other I mart mail who deny statements ns n nI to HI HIdo I do Peabody That man mill Is III ir H t lie hI did dd not the lIlO proposed murder If It In Ii h dill did not furnish the tho t mi ma why they th bring him her to My so o TheO Thelo is Ito o evidence to contradict Harry Or Orchard chard hird Doc Doell counsel expect to wipe wll out nut Ilie fact laNH by hi mero argument They ThC i cannot do so forward nil fin nt 11 In m chronological order Mr 1 next j look Ilok up utI the th Independence deUt depot ex u II He lie ridiculed the Idea that thelt the MIno tIn In Owners WM responsible for tor forthe forthe the ant And that the evi evidence 1 dence In support ort fit of t that Hint theorY theor or mis either from witnesses shown to bo b perjurers or absurd on en the tho lace face of It Tho The were as RS stated by hy Or Orchard Orchard Orchard chard Stave Adorns Adams whom Orchard Implicated was WM not called to him An N f to the tho being off olt by b a of the Mine In Owners a tIC Mr Hawley admitted n this to ho be true tnie The dogs ogi supposed d to be DO following f l Orchard had hod gone gono eight miles from the scene Acene whereas the evidence showed how Orchard lu lI mounted n a horse horo horson I a n mite from the tho depot and nn had hat ridden some olne SO 30 O miles or more before he fore night fall fait 1 c ATTEMPT OX ON O Bit ABBEYS IFF Bringing his hili argument down to lo tho the on the lle life of F I W Bradley Ur tn In San S n Francis rr fr review 1110 cd 01 nr OMIt t the tho testimony as n to money mOlle mOllent tent sent nt to Orchard Orchord In San co by b George A As s to the tho lh mo rno motive tive live t It wes was to tot chow to t the th world that the federation dirt did not forgot Its it enemies oven on flier after 1 L Li i lapse of ot years yr Bradley had bed horn been the U Of or the lUll Hill end and Hul II van mine which was wu blown up In Mr Hawley recalled lo to the th Jury thc tho lh 1 testimony It regarding the tho registered letter ietter sent sen by II J Wolff In Denver to 10 toV V Orchard Or In Soc San Francisco and con COil containing tamIng t WO w I rt a clerk clork In PettI pell bon store testified to that he ho ent tho letter leUer 1 Why Iy hy n Id T lr tIr Bradley they put on In u the ho stand to 10 testify as to 10 his Iii connection with Iho e j 7 I will wilt leave leavo for Cor them to explain t FollowIng the tho letter loiter thor there wan WIH sont to In Orchard by telegraph This wail Willi from Irom Pat t Dolen Then Thon O was sent from J Wolff Tho io Jure on both applications was In the thc th handwriting of at George Georgo A the thit th attorney d 1 lord was wai sent liy IJ him to aid tId Orchard In tho the don uton of ot a IL crIme The money mOlley was wn ob oh t n I nod from and his iha col cot colleagues leagues This Thin Information as II to Orchard depositing money with nod and nodI I noting a llnA as nil n his bin honker bunker l Iii ab oh absolutely and It tin rm tn to refer teter to tl It The only they lh la II from Mrs Day It In hi rot not worthy of consideration Why h gentlemen it Ir was ailing a an II l for Orchard why wh h ho hI s Rend the tho to 10 him In hH hi own 1 huid 1 thorn there hOlm hOlmAn nn in to mystify or j took tool Rood core CRIO to t seo litI that his hi namo Will was not with tho the transactions In inny a away way wn ny i I Mr Ir r hawley Y that Orchards statement as ni to tl 0 tue explosion lol were corroborated nIl born out In every cory detail even een by h Introduced by IJ iho defense nR As AN to the tle gas gaa gl theory theor Mr said thet after the 4 explosion po other cause could be con conceived concel conceived cel d Jt It ivas os that tho the gas I company com pan should hukI bo be bl sued Rued It ft 1 nit It to tobo he bo expected eXI ctet t witnesses who lut I to the tho belief heler that gall Kas ga had bad been heen tho the muse false would now In the of ot Orchards Orchard confession that they the hail hailS S been absolutely mistaken nod and wrong rons t Das Ons could not hat have brokon In tho the tiled floor IOOr of the th vestibule as a was wast the t 0 ae In the Nothing hut hot dynamite could coul have hao acted arteil In that way WOY I Mr Jl Haw ley said the I testimony of oC the gilt ROI expert Introduced In by the th sate did didaway away avah with tho the Impossible theory that tho the Kas gae uns Ignited by nr Ho lie lo tho the Idea Idel that enough c gas ROi go could have hn accumulated to hove havo caused c a explosion without the odor being detected throughout tho the I Why If Ir the thi hallway had hnit been tIlled filled with gnu J an nA we have told air Mr lIr himself would havo hoo been hern as asphyxiated la lah a h before ho he could have hn IC reached I the front tron door dor Tho The tact fact that thet nothing was WIS burned up ell entirely thin tho notion tint BUS caused auel the explosion Ar AE Ar t Q o luncheon recess wa WM ordered orden it until 2 p m to 1 Mr 11 hawley ho he would conclude during the thear afternoon ar ernon |
