| Show 1 l Iii hero Il etc tn aim ho o iVi III t Into court MIl and shown to t you U ills HIli In t this room tO gIr gl f the lift fl lo If n th nt made by coun H th tho tM facts r ts mo 1110 e not as nA I 1 have 1 them t WHY WAS pr n NOT D There Them Is s jut just ono other man inai who could deny deity dell statements f n nil its 10 In 00 Peabody hit man mati Is IA O P It U ho hI iU did not counsel th h proposed prop sM murder It t hi h did not furnish tho NOW Mil uns un why they the bring hm irn here hf rc o to fy MY 1111 thero JB 19 no evidence to contradict linn Or Orchard chard DOCK Die D j counsel expect to out outBid Bid ilio facts by b I mire argument ThY IM cannot do so n forward nit nl address 1 in IlL chronological order MV Jh Han l Icy next took Ilok up tha tM th Independence depot d pot ex exit r it ill U HI c ridiculed the tho Idea tei that tile tho th tIne MIn Owners association n vv A responsible for tor forthe forthe the tha outrage 1 and ud n that tho evi CV evidence Vl dence adduced in support of or that theory theoryS I wan WM either t from witnesses shown hwn to bo b S perjurers or utterly on the tha th face tuce 11 of ot It The ts were nil flIt stated filMed by Or Steve Stee Adam whom implicated was wall ai not called to contradict him As M to 10 the tM dogs to being catiM oft oct by 17 R ot or the Mine Owners as M association n Mr admitted tm this t to bo bl true The doii supposed d to be bo following Orchard had gone gono eight mile from the tIle scene icene whereas tho tha evidence Orchard nl had 1111 mounted a 1 at lore horio horion loren n t L mile mII from flit depot nod and had ome om s 3 G miles or moro more betor before night 4 ATTEMPT IP ox Oi O urn LIFE Jils argument down clown to lo tho I on nn tile tho Ufo of F 1 W V Bradley y yIn In n San Sm Francl M Mr review r ilow cd ell first the th testimony Jt it 1111 to money mOlle mOlleR sent R len to Orchard in San Francisco by b Georgo A As All to tho 1110 uth motive tive against It was to show 1110 to the LI world worl that th tho the federation did not forgot forget Its even 1 L Lh h lapse of ot y H Bradley had th ho hot manager r of ot the Hunger Hill and anit tuI Sul t Ilvan IIan mine Which ww Willi bl bI wn up In 1890 Mid Hawley y recalled to the jury jur tho tim tp testimony regarding the tho registered letter sent by J Wolff In Denver to Orchard In Son SlIn tn Francisco o and an con containing containing Wolff n clerk In lc tI bonos StOre stoic te that he ho ent tho the thol letter l Why Shy akl Jjr Ir Idt they put I on tho th stand to testify tf an n to his th connection with these t matters I 1 r will leave that for to Ii explain Hollowing F tho Lijo Lh letter them ther was i nt to by b telegraph t 0 I This fhI was l from Jt Bowen Dowen Then O WH Wall sont from J IV Wolff lIt Tho Iho ho sUnn lure on both hoth applications war wair In the handwriting of nt A the th attorney ator cy declared and aini ww Wt sent lent ent l llY by v him 10 o aid aIt Orchard In 10 the tho FInn slon of o IL L cr I Tho jho ho momy Y wa ob b s i from Haywood and hlf col cot l Thin ThIH Information n as n to Orchard 1 b l with P and a nil his banker r IB hi b ab lib absolutely aby y ridiculous and It belittles an ILO to t to it Jt Tho only y th have Is In from fr Mrs Ir Lottie r Iy iy It t is IH 1 rot worthy Ot Of r I consideration ron Why Wily K lr lrI v j I wt notIng aH aM i hankel for or Orchard why no to the thO mony to l him in Iii hi hii mn i J name namo WhY should houi there thoo the havo hen heen heenan he heI an I Il attempt to mystify or conceal Geor ro took Rood good caio caro to toReo tot t Reo Mo that Ills hili hI namn narno was not l with Ith tho manoy transactions In f way j Ir 11 Hawley that Orchards statements an to the th Bradley y explosion were nd rl out In every detail oven an by hy witnesses VIlIl Introduced by 1 v tho the defense nse As AM 1 to lite tI ga as theory Mr r rc I c Haw Hawley ley saId Mid that hut Immediately after tho Iho explosion lonJo no fl could be con eoll end J VIM that tho gas gu company should bo be sued It 11 wn not Mt to 10 tob tot tobe j b be expected that witnesses WIll WIIt io testified t fled fied to Urn the belief belIer that gas had bad been the rause would admit now In the light of ot confession that they bad luid been absolutely abs l mistaken r And wrong Gas Oa could not have broken brokon In tho the tiled tei floor of Oth the he vestibule as n wa i the tho taM case ao In the tha t Nothing but dynamite rould have I acted tl in that Y S Mr said laid the th testimony of or tho thoRan Ran nl expert llert Introduced thir d by bythe the th sate sale did t ii way with the tho Im Impossible theory that 1 the tho gas ga was Ignited by cigar 3 Ho also nio rod leu I ml the tho tle Idea that enough Ugh ins gas could have hase accumulated to have 4 caused 1101 such a n n explosion wIthout l the odor being detected throughout throughput tho the house hou i 2 Why if It the hallway had hll been en filled 1 with wih pis as nl 0 i hl been told Mr Ir t Bradley himself have havo been heen as asphyxiated Il before he could have reached the tho front door Tho The fact that nothing L wa as burned aNlo n upsets entirely tim tho notion that gus gas caused ed tho the explosion As Al tho the luncheon recess rece was wa waP ordered until 2 p in 1 Mr Ir 1 that ho he would conclude during the afternoon |
