Show j I WHO HO HAS NOW NO GOT r THE HU I I Jr i r Chandler Chandl r Cant cat Produce I Il It Because He Know l Foster Parents I 1 i HABEAS H BE S CORPUS QUASHED i Arm rl M IIi Ii Il S j ot I oil After I Brief I IA uN h I In hi rod I IThe The flie question lon of ot the th lol of Or the Infant oi o 0 Ethel Hurt HUIt Win was he rd before h Judge Armstrong rm this nii In the district 1 court cOIl when Mrs lr ir Hummels petition for fn n a writ oC habeas corpus Di Ii rf i M ll Chandler to II compel 1 him hi in to In produce the child Id In hi II so M that tIu th Ih right of ot possession rOP t l lI i iU U ii I might II iii ight ht he ie determined del rin I was W o p up ii p for fr r hear hearing lug ing ht The fhe evidence showed the I I was waR from lm St Ht Marks hospi hospital hO JI 1 1 tal lal two to days after ti Its 1111 I birth and that IL was II Iii II to tOI t ft a couple II residing H outside nf if f Halt I Lake Ilk CI itt Its present where vliet I 1 II not 1111 known knowl by either cither lhor DI Dr DIOr I Chandler or Mrs Mis 1 Hummel I Dr 11 led ed cd 11 led n a I motion to In 11 th It of ot corpus and tint nt It I IH granted hy h Judge Armstrong Hence child chilI will 1 remain tn iii 11 the custody of ot Its II it foster par J I for fOl the I ie e present nt st I I least kast II n Mrs rl j toI lod I J Will be he h deprived of o Its I 11 cus cussins els 1 I 1 sins IS JUM s STORY sonY T Mrs rs was 11 In nUIl this thI morn morning r j 1 ing In accompanied d by h I her mother molher Mrs Ir ft A Run foil and was ts Lis the iIi first witness called In II the Hue admitted V a tow few dAY clays prior to the limo birth of o the 11 f Child Ih h toki Dr Pi Chandler that she would not bo he attic able n hII to In rare care for far It and RII f I 1 asked n kd him hini to find Ilni a home lomE for tOl It I The I dot i or 1 her hll to tl think HIP Ihl matter malN mattert F t over lr she he did in so ff and nn again I I made ld tho r Oll l that he ht find a 1 place Illace I for ft It II Two TI days utter after Ifer It Il was as born burn the she he heI I Sn Mint I ha t sumo lomo II nta ll one OH cume lo to the he I hospital has liosI ml took lIme HIP and ammil all since that 1 t she hp tins hns been leen unable to tn Und tIn any ni trace nace of or r It I She that thal she he had liati no lie to I Li kePt keep 1 the tle child until four faur r days davs Us its It birth when her mother I visited her h at the hospital hl and 11 urged i 1 her ier In lo have hae time tho Ihl returned 1 She then thel told her hr mother r that tha l she hp desired to tl II possession of the th child hlll and mini i declined Hint I ha t she hl sent lt i K mm note noto tn to Dr to U that erred effect It 1 wa W s as s shown fl tutu Hint this was Wi va n it I number of I lays days dl after that the note lall was She Shem m Mid aid i that the hlll wits was horn on nn May liV MaV 1 ti anti that Hint It on 11 It I L l She Sh Inquired rt nH am to Its Il f on Ill several occasions but bul had hilt 01 II it hence she to toan tor tO nothing boUt about I a I hll 1 appealed and n the petition for COl a 1 t writ r an Jh In I th of or habeas was tiled L t o corlie I C CHANDLER CALLED i Ur Or wal called 1111 lo to the lime stand dand j In behalf of o petitioner but nothing WH WU gained front from him because IC IIO of or the ob oh objection or ot his attorney who stated that hil It was not shown that Dr Chandler hail had hat hati I knew kuc i of ot the child or that he Il t of If t Its 19 thereabouts Hi lie Il did dil state time limu ho 10 know oC ot the th baby hily being taken liken from trl r A thu hospital und that Hint he hi h telephoned tu to the 11 that the persons OI who de tie desired sired ti to In luk It hud had hut his hil Time The best belf he hI pho an mimi to lu time thu I vh ie bouts lis of the lie child was that It I taken to 10 n u 1 place In lit Hazel to a Mr Irs Arthur Two other oIlier women Mrs Mr 11 Ensign En and an Mis 11 Lessor worn were orA aIm present nt at that place ilace and Iu ho h could not 1101 say may which one took look the Iho child or J where It II IB II now He lie HI related a n COI ulon with wih Mrs Ir Hummel Hu In which she Ile said abl all that she sheI wonted 1 her hel child chil hack bark an a 1 she realized I what n a she III hail had brought upon her hel family mid IUt admitted that limit If It she got gOl gOli i It Il back sho sue would have to lo hire litre some I I onn OOM to tu take lake cans caln of ot it I He lie le Informed her h lid 1 that Ihal it t was al too loO late as I he did di not nat natt lintt t 11 whore the tho child chil was ties 01 Ho lie le also J i It C klow that an In ii hour after tho thE th baby bab J was wall born bol ho asked askel Mrs Hummel to tc re reconsider rei consider her IH r request to give Il the child 1 t i ay and Informed her that the parties parle i who wanted It Ii 1 were uniting for Cor It ami aTI aTIf that they the did not live In Salt Lake Lain City Ity f i Even Een then she Insisted on 01 giving It Itan Itt t 1 an ay i DOES DO S NOT OT KNOW IO hO IT I Ii i fl was WI 1 by b ALly Atty I N V Jones If Ile ho did tint not ot give IIo Mrs 1 Hummel lummel form forni 1011 und that he ho did 11 He le I a wad wai then asked If slid she Ih had hiatt recovered sum Um clint It I Ith mi nit fl hour to 10 know kno what she was doing dol ll 10 to which he ho replied that Illat she sue hud had He lie e told toll her tier he said saidI lall lallI I lint It I would be bl too late lato to 10 reconsider Ie m the tho matter matlEr utter titter thu wan pone gone jOP The fie doctor admitted that he lie had bath given bitt 1111 content to lo the time child being taken wor hut but bil Insisted that hu ho hI hud bud not lH r communicated with mba thu who took It since then timen und anti did not nol know kno where hero It Il wim 1 He lie le was IS asKed c If It IK hi h hail had nut not withhold nil All ni ho he hoid hud had id concerning It It I t Atty AU tty K r F O 0 cli objected to the question and amid the tite court the objection t The Tho motion to tilt I writ wai wa wathen then thou argued briefly by br the tho attorneys mid cud was grunted ru by b the court nUr Mrs IS will wi devote h hem ii to hull ig where h I time the child U Is M 10 so thai I proceedings migs may 11 be h brought I the i it parties to 10 recover H it HC II itC C C CIU I l an un e of the Ih ij Line Lino Lilo In la tho the of O the 14 I child mut tul as 8 he hurl hud not lived 1 with wih his hla wits licit I h h marriage last 1 ho he knew le nothing about Ii a ease caa aI Mth 1 Hummel H ulel IH u a I I U In 11 the employ of ot the lime t I R n u Ii pun Dun agency In itt th this city tl cIL Bho IThe now no r ro I rides Idl on al the corner coiner of ot West Vest Mid And ind South streets street tl |