| Show m DARROW DARRON TAKES TAKEO A HAND Fur For First Time in the Haywood Case C S Questions Men Who May Try His Client Clent VOICE SOLEMN IMPRESSIVE Asked Pride if He Would Like to be Tried by a Jury In His Frame of Mind Ic to 10 n L Thins Sen Wore K x for fOI One or GE 0 i BoIse Ida T May I 11 The line lne of tf pre pc preliminary pr progress prose s tho empanel ing of ot n a I Jury to 10 try t William D Hay Haywood 11 IIa wood for the alleged murder of or o Frank has h crossed cro sed the front row of at te tit and ai by Ij thIH afternoon vill 1 pass into the rear line jine lne The TIl fifth Irh Pride a II young oung farmer farmerS as S parsed se shortly utter after U 11 1 and Ind when court roso ISO for tor thu Ihu ngn re recess recess r cess the Hie effort efort to 10 fill 11 tho the sixth II th chair chairs s III lt progresS The defense deCenso must still examine tho thu entire row before r p challenging can cal commence DARROW TAKES A H D DIr Mr Ir Darrow who today for the first rt i tok LOOk up the examination of ot o tales men meu gave RC a n L tone tolO of or solemnity to thc tha th conclusion of his 1218 examination oe oC Tales ales man Pride Advancing to o a I point where whelo he immediately faced the th tales tiles nine man he leaned forward and In an on Im mm Impressive voice asked ked him if I ha h were on QI trial tar for his life Ifo if It ho would bo bG prepared to 10 be bo tried by 12 men in his frame of mind Pride first said that that he be hated hated to contemplate such BIch a II thing thins and that the ie defendant could coul do worse In Iii 11 Jur Jurors jurors juror ors or than he was Pride irida said he e did dd not want Bont to serve OL WO on tho the Jury jul but that ho would do II his duty fairly CHALLENGED D BY UY DEFENSE J L Ii J Waggoner tho member of the I original panel who figured OB as al the tile com corn complainant complaInant in the tho tho Yost os case enee was vas chal ch chI I by tho thU defense on Or o the tho general that his hil experience in the case casei i him for tor service In the case a contention which he be admitted was well wel founded and nud au Judge Wood yoo sustained tho the challenge Two from tho the special venire elire developed irremovable prejudice circumstantial evidence and arill nd went welt ent down dO dOtHoro tHoro challenge from flom the tho slat Tho Tho Th tree free circulation of ot socialistic pa papers PI p pers p rs throughout Ada county again tills time lime lUring during tho the examina examination e lion tion of or Pride With 12 men In tn the box hor ho four t oui nf ot v horn hom hud been passed without chal chat chati i USI og for fol cause causo by both sides the tho of for tOI duty dut on ontie tiu thi tie jury was wa resumed short shortly ly after atte 10 19 this y morning moring Tho The confined jury panel early curly took tooka a long Ions walk aIk In tho the lulls hills his hack back of at Boise Dolse Three deputies d accompanied them S Darrow ot of Chicago took up tho the for fol tho the today beginning with wih J L Sr i In seat No o S 5 L Waggoner is 1 tho the thoman thoman man who was complainant In the tho Ih case against ginst W V N Yost who was sos recent jy charged chursed with Ith having approach approached ed l a proposed juror Mr 11 Darrow asic id Ld Waggoner about this experience with Yost Yost Did Dd you have any nn an opinion as IS a to tov v filch side Mido 1110 the man camo came from fromM M nether hether I hel the tho state sl te or ai defense I Yes es 1 had an opinion replied Waggoner Did Old he h try tr to 10 Influence your ion In this case 1 I 1 dont know But you soro ho he did cd In your OUI at af against tho the man The Tho complaint was drawn up and Ind 1 J swore Vore to l I It Itow Now 01 ow then your our bi I n affected by hy all al you havo hlo heard Emrow tarrow lied n nd lon In thin case caso asked Mr lr 1 I gU ss It has replied Waggoner n el 1110 Waggoner was ras WI finally excused excuse by br consent Cn fn and J W u a u livery Ivery sat I waa li called caled to occupy the tho vacant HAD THOUGHT OF O CASE CASK was WIS questioned first bv by IJ Mr 11 Hawley for tor or the state Ho lie said he be h bad had hoart the Iho case cosa 1 cu soc lint but not to any uny great extent No had 1 over attempted to cus tho the matter mater with him and Ind ho he l hud taken 1 a particular Interest II In IV I 1 Hn tin II hud had read lead of ot tho th Ih from flom time lima to 10 in the Ih local II Hum Have you formed format an opinion a 1 siy Ir Hawley r I hava thought about the cuto CUi bout about C out th the outcome but I cant anI say nuy 11 I hao any 1 definite opinion J I believe bellevo Unit lull 11 It If the tho defendant IH Is I he ho ought to tn bo be punished and if n IB is II not guilty ho he h ought to 10 bo ho turned aie I loose o e Hihl ho had ills tilse thought of cC I manner l In h which the tho vu U 01 m to 10 and ami had made utIe lale up his hil hi mind nn as Il to 10 or ir Ir It wax Wil tight i ur or II Ilon long Ho no l In havo n a clr u I dial mill an 1 thle 1118 t I i tn Ill lied forth a I rein the tho state Wo o deny deity delY the o n ii inic I y III In of Qt the tho itt fur tJ tiu th defence so in II i I i Oll i the Iho laio tOlO in in inDo Do 00 you ou moan t 10 i any my hut If I tile lie runt rIt Instructed you ou lust Hint le t I 1111 l tat l wim Wil you Ol would not no alto lallO the tho of ot the Z Nul ot U if It I t ili evidence was uli I lal in I IHu he I WIH he lie would nut nt convict a ii 1 nl of If r murder Tho ihn III I I on Its 11 I Is dial chat longo on 01 the ground of or bias Wt V l will wi In Kaid Mr II I 1111 t lie I our niI On i i lii ol will vl I I be lil In y ci roe isi cit n I ia I In thin his I IU ese une This hl jun J hut hUB 41 I in I ti ii he cannot vu net fl 11 II It h tty le The e 1 sc a n ii i u nl I the lie t dial I JOI mid ui Cullar or iU j nisi the tho III titles talc 1111 1111 men man lun menI He II I I e d ho lie hI tumid noti hi a ii L a et no I an its 11 asi 11 i HH us 11 ul Ecu ii ila i i I Tho The court COIt will wil ill the thu Ih for tor bins ruled Wood Tho lie d nolad mi nil 11 Allon lon I Io 3 hue a I t fin a nu rint i next 1 I t Wil fl tel I led l Mie to to sent Knot 11 lt No Ni 5 S Hi le 1 I e an ii Yi IE ii su I a e only the tho I ull ul u I I the tho t iu tione Ilund 1 p by II Ile fur tir the tho and woe wun Wil illicitly middy turned over aver to t Iho for or I IrilA that Ihu t ha lie le hud 1111 no ci nl iu d i iou ny of II tile tho Ihl I 1 Ii el i 11 0 Iy I iii ii ic lift hi h lill II k n s lout I Ili I Jin I M s JiLl hn ho I In tn thu tiit ll pull 1111 Uc lAc but do Ito lid Ill not ul all ul i J of it I Tho rho defendant b ti ht would hn 1 to be bo proven guilty before he le found him liin no so 10 Pride said his hil liI famIly con l td of Ir n wife ned mid unc two 10 young daughters r Hi lit Il t I 36 years of or ago age li Is I a tint hot tint not u I church Pride e admitted that ho he hC hud liati hll dIscuss cd ed the Ihl ease rOEe with tin HIP Ihl delut who ho nuin lm 10 I cd him hint for tOI jury jur end and entertained the nt ot dinner Mr li h drew lew from frol tin the l the that I tie deputy hail had said hi lit was WIM formerly a n at ut lt the state tte pen peti lieu ent t in hI 11 i and Ilc a ii d talked t Haro lurl IJ UI chard This was as tIm tho HII time Oi 01 chords ehlI niini had hae been heel brought into Inlo the tho CUSP cuP What hut did tile the deputy nay any about L Ore 1 cil Mr MI Hi the HI tOll told mo me ml whet what kind of man he lie hew lieh het w t In n a 1 general sort rort of way a h Phi ho lie 11 wiy sit a anything an as to Orchards reputation for tOl veracity No sir sirOr Or 01 lS as to his Ills being n a 1 religious man manNo No NoWa Was Wa this talk after you ou had hae been heen as lS u n juror Well the deputy had no exactly served servell el the tho summons but hut I r knew kne what lie he there here for Did Pil you n read what Mr II nOo veli said this lil cose cuse coseYe Ye Yi some seine ol e of tiC It I Did lid It Influence you 01 In nl wa waThen way wayNo lr No Then you would not lot care yore what tho the president thought 1 it I would not 2101 affect my 1 ii verdict Would It affect your opinion or judgment jud Would No you oUCIle care to be he In iii II the lie de defendants o place with wih such Ilch a u man as y yourself I like to tl bo 10 in 11 that Then circumstances ion fion under any nn i inner after a n pause the added lint But It might aught be worse Yes Yos or 01 it II might aught be he better heler ro roMr 10 Mr Mi ll Darrow PrIde said he lie know knew of or nothing in 11 hIs to 0 prevent his serving on tho ile jUr jury Hut But I 1 would rather not ho he added Idlet have you ou any un all particular views on labor unions I 1 thInk unions are arc ro all ni right In sonic some respects but in others otherl they are aro not all right al Hae you ou any alY prejudices against labor laboi unions Not particularly i Thy The Th deen e passed tho the without challenge for cause and re reserved reserved reserved served tho the right to question queston later la tel the deputy deput who served the tho Jury summons upon Pride und and who talked to him blat about the case SEAT SEA NO C G t Mr Darrow next took up the thc exam examination of ot George Walker the butcher bulcher who was passed Into litto seat leut No G 6 Glast last Thursday Walker said aid nt at that time that he ho had bad nn an opinion and a chal challenge lease lenge was interposed by br the suite state The defense resisted at the time but to today today day er a a few questions by hy Mr 11 Dar Darlow Darrow row low the defense joined In the tho request for fol Walkers alters discharge It t was ordered by b Judge Wood Raymond Jones a farmer talmer was WI called caled Into the tho box Jones said aid ha he le came camu to tol Idaho Idah l from rein Iowa He Be formerly worked In a n saw saI mill Answering mi Mr Ir Hawley Jones Jone said Ild he le had an nn opinion but It was not nOl a strong one and Ind could bo ho changed by bythe the Iho evidence Havo fluxe Huo you yoi 0 an opinion at this time as to the guilt sul or 01 innocence of the thc ac accused accused Yes sir But you ou could disregard it In the light lh of evidence Yes YeN Jones said he had neither n ither rec received hed nor nl read city of the socialist which had ha ben been b en freely distributed In iii Inand and Ind Boise during durin the past f tew fv iw months Jones had been examination nearly nealI halt hal an au hour before b ore Mr 11 Hawley finally Dually asked him If It ha hI had any In conci con cl scruples against capital pun punishment ishm cot cotI nt I 1 have ha e said aid the How long hove have you ou entertained that Idea asked Judge Wood l I was raised that way war wa Excused said the tho judge who shio sug suggested lug suggested that thaI In 11 future it would be well wel to ask tho the about thick their scruples earlier In the tho examinations HARD OF OI HEARING C H If Frank a n farmer who said sale ho he was hard of ot hearing was WIS called to the va vacant mt chair and with hand held back of ot his right ear er listened to the tha questions put by b Mr II Hawley He Ho saId Hald he ho had bach an opinion but It was not fixed Frank was challenged by Mr Mi 1 Darrow on the ground of disability but the attorneys for the tho state resisted arid Ind Judge Wood denied tho the challenge e Mr lr Ir then thel drew dr W from rota the tales man the admission that hat It would re rc requIre quIre strong evidence to remove the thC opinion he had already formed A dial chal challenge lenge len o for fat cause wax WIH aN consented to by tho lie state slate and ald Frank Frnk was excused Burt was Wi called cled Just us as tho the luncheon adjournment until 2 Z p tn m was WIS ordered |
