| Show ARGUMENT FOR CHANGE OF VENUE IN MOYER CASE h of If n ft lor or U II of cof v nu In the therlo wu wee oOn d to la dllY Mol M J Woot lt would render 1 ri 11 25 5 We e contend lId OUT our bone SIr II C Imd con be In ill couett Ir I nUmb flie tIme I to it deLc pf I hilt A jury lie be oC it n n nut lr then hOMr CUll it II to 10 11 o It ItIn itin In ide I Mr IT n f r the The our honor ett up II 0 11 10 the e tJ isi III Mt II a faIr heN 1111 lUll lit It juL juci fill n hurl I In n tiny other iti In Oils thie it f I 1 toni IUn I 0 ii be ba truo Ii 1 Inh trial may he hu huit tor fo rhe litell 11 mit IC thorn I Ia ti 1 the der 1111 VOU U ter toy it thon In iii Cell theY be given Ih the ot o II o 0 venue to Whet n Ii 18 tta litre fn that cute b be l Jo 11 cut ul U tOO OO t it II I heNr JILO e r Itoh tl JaniL i 1 mild J IU itt IIa fer itt mr In Lii In the label hind riot or M a Se hUM no lie ht to r their beti oel t troa fI cetti re I Cull rull II Pt of the tite truth tt tI thc th hunt m cnn 1 tie 0 had hod It I I it II N of 01 lice tho 11 liw thin thill III e itch tr h he oUt wed I Ih Ir COMe whit Willi 1 county the II would Lh 10 o aM iMn tIk Ak tr ir Mr I 11 l r the If mOlt o I IV tji IY that We e elicit expect 10 tiC HO on in cud Ity C lk th thre n lit III thy 1111 itte I will a re tt 11 lake III I we rJ LQ u j th r I l to h II tiie II Rt f 10 l I S SJ J 14 io nil tIt In be let tOr trial come lorn tint Mn 10 1 ns J q ld I |