| Show ECHO OF OGDEN SCANDAL CASES SES Supreme Court Hands Down Two Opinions on tho tha Skeen C amp ai jp 4 AFfIRMING THE JUDGMENTS ii E EIkO IkO tJ time IlL jil Orl The supreme court coOrt bOy toWn two 11 10 the famous Og Ogden den cases the judg judgments ments of r the loiter C It ip both hOlh By Bythe Bythe the opinion of the court In the ease ot of J I fl t v ort aPI B nip IlP i I en lId rom the thoe at o 1 1 unc nn will t n 11 lIis ide that lIllIe IH rees fees willie while s serving us uso o 0 11 and and oll cb him wilful neglect of af hIs t l lii 11 the jower ow Jr court the defeu tie ile Q the on the thoe special that thaI It two cause QC of nic tion uS one cause This demurrer Ill the that tie he the but bul that he litti repaid the ainu to 01 11 City he re resigned signed m tile and was ren 1 tn anti l W wits S serving under his at lime he lime th the was a Ire to 10 prove proe lii the trial that the te repaid enS alee als offered to show his previous r anti Inte but the tho court refu refused Dd to allow I t do SP 80 Cite In iii Instructed tile the jury lp p I t I I ty J aL ij egl or il nd mt IL wits II allt hE jUdo or of l front tine pie PIO tC The nc of the lower Court lurt lu in tILe demurrer anCl an refusing to 10 permit the hi to that I 11 lie repaid tILl the tees fees and tu 10 show hIs SOD good chu are alc cited DS as errors by the The court holds that the lower court urt did not err In Ia overrating the Ion tor thu reason that tl IL In the to 10 return n ii pf of not nol guIlty on au the second charge hargo mOde Paine amid hence too matter entirely ely out aut of the heads of lC the Jury Neither did the tho err In hi to allow the defend defendant ant to prove rove life good tc for forthe r the reason such could lIc not t In wily effect t the admission of uc cc Illegal f fees cs As to 10 the repay ment ot of the lees the count ourt hoda that thal die hiti not and not Jot for lila ot oC the thc law TIll The cont contention that the rC resigned his office anti wa waa under n cun not hold good col to time opInion or the tho curt coUrt The show that he re Ie resigned signed and was reap reappoInted I poInted ly by the council counell on the tho r nIght uriS any other U l tr n and hence did slot lIot stir ur Lenaer hI his at al all 1111 On that mat mal malI matter I ter rt the 1110 co Coart suy soya further True the would havo to but nil all was a mner mer inciter oI of Corn Corm and to tolerate euc aue proceedings and permit thom to stand tand ns no Jl a e Indeed he be a 11 tra e unity of lC bt both 11 la low w and aut Justice Justices ts s to the Iho that them thet section un In i which time was WIlS brought Is nal the court holds hold that thu jt ft Is III not arid and timi bring un an action tar the T removal of not Olt to La 1 ho 13 by irn Im Imp p nt mind such actions titi not lulO to 10 be In the ot of th the elate The Th jud ot of the I 14 affIrmed Thu Jho was by and l In by Justice CUmi Ob 01 lOL POLICE The Thu other ca cau which wee VIII It III Or of J 1 D YS vs E chIef of police polle of Skeen ehl r wIth wilful emit disregard of at hJ his official Imposed 01 by the city itt fir Tho Iho rom com II III tIme ll court c ml Ln Liz the amo n its that In th the tn ruse I and demurred to it on tim 1151 III n no or of of the Ibl lIt 11 Tile The demurrer was IUS rus tamed b i th the curl court th l ito aC tiomi was Willi II Jt It wo wits ly the tho attorney lime thu t that the Iho gave of 01 mad i such ln as till chief of poll to the aunt dt council omi time court 1111 had no over the subject or of his removal 1111 coat en lop j I hy the eo cort rt which thuI II It II general rube rul tho no fit such The or of the tho 1 lower curt court IJ Ii This opinion waH nl also o wrItten II by Ju noLt con lii III hy by time oIlier ot of this |
