OCR Text |
Show District Court Notes Tho following business or local Intel In-tel ust was transacted In thu district court since our last Issue. Ann 1. Chlpmun vs. Wlllatd Cltlp-innu, Cltlp-innu, the hearing on order to show cause why defendant should not bo adjudged In contempt of court for Mlhuu to comply with the decree lelu-tlvo lelu-tlvo to transferring certain property to plaintiff, un order waH nuido after hearing part of tho evidence for certain cer-tain Bheep to bo ouuully divided bu-twepn bu-twepn thu lltlgunts. Jessu M. Harmon Har-mon and A. J. KvaiiB wore appointed commissioners to make tho division. Furthur hearing was continued till September 24. In tho suit or George W. Strnw vs. Temple, Vosburgh & Carlson, judgement judge-ment was rendered for plaintiff in the Bum or $1,135.78. A ten day's stay of execution was granted. Arraignments wcru continued until September 21, In thu cases of thu Statu vs. Josoph Youngbcrg and American Am-erican Fork City vs. Lawrence John-sou. John-sou. Lehl City vs. John Franklin Smith, nnluwful salu or beer, und tho state vs. Carl Anderson, felony, pleas or not gulity weic intend. State on inivrmullon or John S hums, city lwu-sniil or Lehl, against certain Intoxicating llouora kept lor salu in Munition of law by Geo.'' Heck and by Franklin Smith, deluujtsuf uotenuaiilB oi'deicd piucud on cnioii-dur cnioii-dur and causes set lor hearing Sep-lembui Sep-lembui it T. J. Cliipmnn et. til. huvo com. inuiicui suit lot SOo.iiU with interest .dicged to bO duo plaintllTfl trOm M. A. Siinlth tor trulling sheep on land uased fiom thu eovornmoiit by plain- lifts. , , . l'aclflc Suiteu Saving and loan company com-pany has brought suit ngulnst U. 1). I ott una Uolln J. Lett for 438,79 with inteicst at IS per cent per annum from November 1, l'Jia. and for $100 attorneys lees and costs, on u bond seemed by mortgage on Lchl real estate. es-tate. v ! I |