Show WILLIAM H ANDREWS FILES AN AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENSE Pa Nov 0 II It ItA A Andrews I delegate from mom New Mexico tiled HIed an In if iC defense to 10 today today dl day to Lii lh the suit entered against him h hJohn hy John U n Cunningham receiver of HC tho the 1 Nation U bank of ot Allegheny henr Andrews II e denies the debt of alleged to b be due dill on oil two wo hecks claim claimed ed ii In have hun been drawn rewn b by 11 K F R It Nichols Nicholson on the National hank bank lo to the IlK order r of oC Nichols ns sis bearer ami theother tho the other to lo time the order older of ot Andrews lie He says that both were drawn at atthe atthe the Instance instante and t of at tho thim cashier of oC the bank blink for time the aCC accommodation atthe of at the bank to secure sevire currency thereon for tOl use mice of the honk bank ind nd which currency to ti I the mIme he amount of wile was secured I thereon to other l bank anks In Pits Pita Pitsburg hur burg and pM paid and tad delivered Into time Ihl hands hand and custody of tho the I National hank beak on or about th the date of ot tho drawing Iras III of ot the time check Andrews 11 avers 1118 that neither he nor nul e ever r in 1111 any Wa way directly or In dh received any numy b benefit nelt aI advantage mn ta tags tage credit r Ih upon m ui by virtue of ot the checks II er further that t on Nov 1 J 1 OS hi In paid lucid Id Receiver In iii cash on ac account of the time claim In this suit lull He lIe denies h he lie ever eer at III II an any ammy time unlawfully and fraudulently conspired with leh I Cashier lark lank I or cm an any other person to unlawfully full fully any funds or II t that hn t ha Ims requested lequet 11 Nichols to any of ot the thu negotiable hl Instruments sued upon uOn In pursuance of tf army any nr unlawful conspiracy y or that list Frank J 1 J McManus lc ami A I or either of ot th m or both ever made or negotiable Lie meats ments sued suel upon In III this oa r at lit the in tn instance instance stance tance and ani request of t the defendant In pursuance of ot a any unlawful I conspiracy The defendant says 1811 that h he never ut at any time procured from the time Notional N bank army any money upon up ln tiny army written Instrument t sued upon In this thin CAM catiC or In ati any other way in pursuance ance anoe or as al the result recoil or ur of ot any almy unlawful or fraudulent nt arrangement or conspiracy with Ith the officers of time the blink bank or III any tiny of ot them or im with any other per person person son lion aol and he avers 18 that all transactions I with the bank tho sued up Uj upon upon on were r regular legitimate and done in I Ithe the tub duo dUl course ot if and anI In ac at with aith lIh tho the correct corred hanking us usage Sic age and lod practise |