| Show Is not utility arguments in the martin ease case commenced yesterday in morning orning mr J L rawlins making the opening appeal to the jury ife he was follo followed tved by mr fr dickson andA and mr fr peters closed for the people the case was given to the jury about 6 u 0 clock after five days of the alie most assiduous legal n work A ork ever overseen seen within u ith the walls of the third Dist district riot court the jury retired at about 6 and from that time thile until they reentered entered re at crowds crowd S huns hune around the steps leading bip p to lo the the court room and the benches were well filled with anxious friends of bolli boh the deafen defendant lant and the deceased there waz was a silence broken only by the heavy tread of thel the twelve juryman jurymen and the bailiffs as they filed down the room the foreman with the paper in his hand the contents of which meant so much to the defendant the silence was unbroken as the jud judge jude e propounded the usual question to lie he foreman and received the reply we ve have 1 he paper was handed to the clerk and every eye was turned and every car strained as lie he proceeded to unfold the document after the usual formal opening it read we the jury in the above case find the defendant not guilty As the last words fell froni from the lips of the clerk a large number of those in the audience among anione anio nc ix were a number of soldiers diers s in in citizens dress arose and commenced vociferous applause which was soon however cs ed d by the judge who corder ordered cd that thai 41 the c ca ol lenders enders be bro brought b fore him one diminutive individual by the nanie name of meyers 31 eyers happonen hap paned to be within the rail and was v as taken before the judge in who administered a 1 severe rebuke and ini imposed posed 1 a I fine of 10 and costs lie ile asked that all others who were recognized lie ile also brought out but the lynx eyed deputies could recognize recognizes 4 none of the others order being restored the proper delivery of the verdict was made and the defendant discharged discharge ct L |