Show THE LEVI CASE in our lat issue wo lo 10 the stales vs david anso of alio lovi this notion lus elicited much it is elated and criticism conr that he not only pledged himself to the edmunds law lil hod previous required ins second wife to abo simo cn to sign ft inch oho reluctantly did whilst we auvo c iho levi vry highly ns a nc ihori and friend theio can bo nu doubt that he has talen a etc that is not win anted by bood faith in tho roll gimi ho lins adopted and ono that broco it aind to hidu solf as well as lia i lural difo and glicr children and tho covenants ho has entered into if ho did bot intend to hold her any longer allm waa entitled to bo lett aa fco to lal lalo o glicr own couric BO fir ns alio relation went as she as mai ringe betro him alio has suvan small chil dicu the youngest born on the igla dinst A man wh divorced ft mou difo would be inconsistent if not insane to attempt any infringement upon her fulgro she faced from further taking his nam assumes her maiden hamd and is ns arco ns sho a buforo mar rang hini should acho elect t marry another iban ho would be frac from supporting itar nud his future chirgo boull bo limilo d to his chil droR until they old enough to fur themselves the marriage vaa alln of liiDi latin nud tion was fall that and abo rigor f the law could not creed sis la acl 00 thing of to bo measured by dollars and cents or a few months imprisonment or is it of amo v tal force it is 1 that uro levi and his two wives havo ragis with a view of voting at the august election thia is done iu biow of his pledge to judge foreman that he would in the fulgro only hold out ono wife at a timo we must of course consider that ho ii honest in this move as a future infraction of tho liw would be justly followed with bauro rigor than the first off enso |