Show 1117 7 Staten tnt of the revo mon vl 0 o conadio 14 cn the third day of trial the rev hev E I 1 r gree fore the presbytery of utah gal the direct evia evic eDee un er rn b d loep dence loosa kansas as WI W w I being rile 0 r by the prosecution rev ev J T A 11 ln in ingston smith one of the counsel coun ei lor for defense rose to a question of arn elege on behalf of birris himself elfand and associate the rev C P F richardson and made the following statement in substance as follows when we at the of defendant fen dant consented to PA m as his hie counsel we did atas christian men in theline the line of christian dut duty yand and with the assurance of the defendant that he was not guilty of charge I 1 and that be was not dot chargeable before god with any offe of fenes indicated by the tha specifications specification under harge charge I 1 ij subsequent to the censure cens imposed imposed upon him by the presbytery at this place logan utah in april 1894 the evidence that is now being introduced in rebuttal against defendant is so overwhelming as to con co uince ince us of his guilt allt and of oatlie the fact that we have leen been wicked wickedly lv deceived by his personal letters a and n worn orn testimony furthermore had we been in possession of the facts not have undertaken his defense de lense under any consideration an and d we are now ready to submit the case under charge 1 I without argument signed ig ned J A SMITH 0 F richardson RICHA EDSON |