Show DEHM PROTECT 1024 EXT extraordinary ACIRO INARY differences 0 OF OPINION AS TO WHAT IT IS 31 imi W lk I 1 it t binm aik af 1110 1 ill I 1 11 ir lie 44 Is I 1 ar ablit gozolits Gol olits I 1 1 ai 11 1 i wit 1 m if f 1 coill I ili it 11 ii ii li is HM I 1 rp lp to tit hi I 1 ait oit nitch 1 ii 1 l it one of th fmc ar arg iteen s of i 1 i 11 fit ti high timit i is alie i i i that dif alln I i of lir 1 giai i till hi 1011 V bif irp rf W i i 1 nirl th it or oi anh in ii proter nii i edvin their aln ir h insertions filley i i i 1 bmw in nl U k shiell i illy ill y awve li ivr tit 41 free fre I 1 tl i L it etsil to ti ali tl n i i vt v in ili short th thit it thi i chan r i of franceane fraince France and srm armany tr many aay jil HI ir i xi in i i arit enl liili high tariff iio licy tim insertion hn has nil M sf sll ill r i i that wilt who 1 11 i or li jiin in it validity li 11 tn tit regard it aa n true 11 ll is nir i alln tit r pre that ali it the frler the I 1 table sho alii cileli ron conil try file till both arfe fr soll dutiable th I 1 i ills of f til th c lep ami t ti i batio ut I 1 apts lit li imports im porta Ini pors i PA if I 1 ii in III in ur im in III f i millions millions iii ain i sart v i 8 swi w I 1 I 1 berb i tid ma 3 1 ak rp GI 1 ne nal li is SOB SO n L lil kins 13 1 3 2100 I 1 i i 48 wj a 1 ausit in hills garv art 3 5 20 yi fran II 11 I 1 30 WIL 7 71 1 1 i sw bo l ii JOTI 40 tl ti in nora nr win 4 vi 55 i 1 1811 SO SK KS 53 slates late aw V a ma 2285 5 1 11 1 iiii mi awl SS 11 1311 63 68 31 K 1 1 portugal wil 52 5 47 4 imp 1111 A of the ahova above table libia at CIVIL e tile rin estion what constitutes i 1 protective tarifa to this bap happily chose who passed I 1 lie he mckiniry McKin McKi nivy lcy tariff give ill it kieswer asselt that tile r ratu itka fixed liy by the tarifa it ia a fair anti modept ite expression ox atif the protectionist polier anil and anything below it falls fall so h far libit 0 of f being anns rated protect oi PI vini is to tile eidl of the mckinly McKin lv halff tile the nril rate tf of dairy il ay iy wis avi abat 31 80 per cent us as shown in tile thi abort ballif this rite rate wild not consider il a rim din protective rato rat niti was accordingly rii pd d liy by till me kniley katiff to tit betar ii 3 35 and 40 cent judged by this standard steini sti inI ard opp only countries A abow aboa which canle i havin I 1 tariffs ti rits uro Rl rinsei Rin liL Pirt ni il binl I 1 the united stait ana jop io sibly italy sweden and norway would 11 lie 0 om ni lerel partially protective 1 lint glicr rt torild Geri aundra aai tri gaty awl franc franca lie be classed class rd hiu til lish Ingli pst sl if f whoop alio sp is than iliin t L third 0 of that imposed liy by our tariff befort it wis was protective by tar bill and not a fourth of that which WP we now have if a tari IT of over 33 35 per cent of on I 1 ire free and dutiable goods is lint but fair i anil aniol erate protection pro lection thrill the tariffs of per cent in germany and 9 13 to in franai arp free trade tariff but we are told etolil that germany and france Lra uce have c ame tariffs if this is tile cau casi ca u how can it bo be maid fill that tile the mckinley tariff affords but fairand fair and moderate protection does this show that the liang ii regressive dessive res sive nations nat ionis of europe have adopted our policy on the contrary it is to such countries as russia portugal 0 and italy dep despotic otic monarchies with wilh downtrodden find opples oppressed people anxious lint but unable through poverty to leave their native lalive land it is to such countries as eliat tile the advocates ot of high point it as the progressive european Euro peau nations which have adopted our policy |