Show germany ana american boik in his recent betler to the editor of the Gr vyrus 0 mr blaine liine LS raid paid germany erula nv without negotiating a formal treaty lias has I 1 eni ovell t lie ili chibi tion on nil pork anti anil our isi in cou consideration thereof lias has let arlt t lier sugar oi the trea list tins open tr us rii rew new inardi t air in 1 to of american peili will b be con umed per annum annual where not a pound lias has been taken for ten years before germany prohibited the importation por tation of our pork our exports to that country were az aa follows I 1 also 11 bacon and 11 hism 17 1131 pork T ax 1 los total S S L 17 SM H had the prohibition b i t ion not existed we would have hare exported to germany lu in ten years about as much pork as ur mr blame claims clAnn swe we shall hereafter export to tier hr each year it 1 will be noticed that mr blame blaine forgot fargot to say anything any thiu about the german tariff on oar pork the reason he be dd ald no is j because germany still stil imposes i I 1 bigl h sh duty winch which T keep out ut our oar pork ti oot bont cis as wel wip the prohibition of it ha haa ai lone ilone in effect there is tic no enc e w whether ether the prohibition prohibit iov is effected d directly r aly or indirectly indirect lv Iv by digil antles but what becomes f mr blames Ula iries isner se ian that hat the removal ret noval by germany if 1 its tion law irv was I 1 i tri raph of leap reciprocity oclay wl e pra dant harrson Harr dic aares through his private priva ite secret iry tace a removal re coval ot of tile the flork pork hae ha bothin ro thic to 10 lo do with wih my any q ut ul reciprocity but is based upon che he tc jep zep acce taree if by the th darmar garmar q varr nert at t the lae on of if inears fly by this lovarn ir at under tha taa I 1 ow cl 0 the last las coa on 1 eres 1 r |