Show Says the Tribune of November people of tills city have nu example of the way ill which these non-partisan arc non-partisan convention met a few years ago in tho First the nomination made did not suit the Mormon partisan they held a non-partisan convention of their and nominated their partisan They did they I Do you mean the last non-partisan in tho First tho one that nominated who was elected ond is still a member of tho school If you then you know that nt tho non-partisan meeting called for that and others were present and took part in the until it became apparent that would bo nominated and thou they raised tho point that the building was so crowded that many who desired to voto could not get In this the non-partisans decided to hold another meeting so that all citizens who desired to do so could bo present and So tho meeting was adjourned aud reconvened a few days Inter ia tho old Exposition which was almost largo enough to hold all the voters in the At this meeting was regularly but behold tho The after taking part in the first and after securing its to another night nud a larger bolted the nomination so made and put another ticket in the They were Critch-low nt their And now comes the craven defenders of in the First precinct and tho nou-partisans with the crime of doing what its own partisans alone were guilty It no doubt refers to an affair two years previous to this flagrant case of had That more distant case was one in which n portion of a convention that they alleged had been bolted tho convention and nominated a ticket of their but none of those who had taken active part in the first convention took any part in the But charging its opponents with once upon a what its own recently and shamelessly was guilty of in the First precinct this is the Tribune's standard of |