OCR Text |
Show HAYE8 CASE AGAIN. The Provo correspondent of tlio Ball. Like Tribune objects to our revluw of Ihu H.iyc cate, us mot ,,npuco writ-ijik" writ-ijik" with a chance to make "copy" might do, but our priouhieR, we are pU'UM'd toHity, tneHi with the approval of thu people who tire nt-quidmed with the evidence presented In the case. In regard to our original nrile.le, no one charges Unit any Injustice was done ii'iv.iiiu by ihu shnpu public. linn of nllhlavlts on tile with the hoard or par dons, it. is in thu Inferences made and the coiiclutloim drawn that ilie lujii--Hen IS done. Still In regard to tho-u s itue nlllilavltt, even gherltfS'orrs himself him-self stiitet in tit that he iielves at least oiih of iIihiii Is falsn iiud tli d tlie a til ml emt (1 be convicted of perjury. S much for that plume. The lojusilee nullum the ieuileniiiu Intel In-tel esied In thu prosecuiloii of Hayes H done Ik tht newspapers flylnR ut. a conclusion of the ex ineriiM'in of the present convict and their effort in form pti'illc sentiment without close consideration con-sideration of the evidence now at hunr), 'I'll it this has been donu and Is IimIiik done, them Is no qiiegilmi. We claim auulc that there Ih no evidence In the iiltldaviis now on Die whh the burd of pardons. If. accepted as the truih, which xnnonitot Iliyes, while Ic may Implicate Wrlttht. It may hu ttnupoes H.irytoank t'H"llemeu of thu lulelll-euticu lulelll-euticu and siitnr)lucr of ihu members nf thu hoard of pardons to "g slow" In forintng it deeUlon, but It Is certainly proper to nsk It In l)ie cue of tieivs piper writers of the class of the Trl iiiinnV corriiipoudcnt. We do nut know from what, source this attempt loin, ft iciico publli seiitlufoil llirouirh the prcHSiiftlm Statu conies, but wu do know that Ii has u source und Is bulu worked for a purpose. |