| Show I Most M ost Scrupulous of Writers I Is Mary I Our London Literary Letter Leter From a f Staff Star Correspondent dun Aug I Mary Iary Cholm 1 i n Iq safe t to b I Hill II iIi not be b found i I ii ni for a i roli op right law to pro prot pr t t her h cr r titles u her ft fellow I 10 low author authoress nil Rt i IK In at present A new I novel tf in hf hr r pen entitled Prisoner It Pt to If i ic Issued next n month Probably lieS title tub has h been tn used Mi a 1 More of titian times before by y authors of the un on unknown known class clas 1 There bre IB Ja nothing re Ti r motel U lelle of originality bout about bouti i it I but lul Miss name nm h Ii bI I guarantee u that Ut an thing bing the she writes write whatever title It may my bear br will willbe wi willbe be I worth north reading She dose doe dO not gut glit glitter gil giller Set ter on the forehead fo hed of popular mange magn IftA nines s and she the U Is I not given ghen either to Interviews or paragraphs paragraph When hemm she sil publishes a C book bk then thel you 0 hear of her hf not at t ther ather times Hint She Sh l I Is too to but bu busy She I is one of ef the Olt moat tt painstaking and conscientious of modern lt writers The book bk that brat brought bugh her ier el Into Inlo prominence Diana Dina Tempest Tempe took tok her three thre and nd a half bait hal year yera tn to write antI and on revising the tale Ile she h reduced reuf It I by a sixth of or Its 11 length lied le Pottage occupied her almost alm as a lone lon as a ll and ad It I i t inot ii not 1101 surprising ln to learn Ilm that thaI her h new damage dama or loss Ion lo It is I a difficult matter m tl en entitling In entailing titling tailing also alao all the publication of agree agre agreements ments and statements The Te dameg dang speaks for Itself I should II say aay I In t tIc th i stealing or appropriating of what is i an at others arid and An trw the Ih consequent tul and confusion caused Iud by b the theft theft Cannot Miss 11 pres r II bi rIght to Gods e hood Man lan an Rn Hall Hal Oo Cain Calne lay I no 0 claim to The he Christian ehrl or John Strange Winter inter to her hH well I known Booties Dotts Baby Db Have Une D likens Did n nand and Thackeray or MIss MiM Bradden or o r Collins no right to hold boltS their celebrated titles as a their own If some lome penny journal jural or provIncial 1 chooses 01 to steal teal them It 1 seems In Indeed indeed deed dH ag as If I the Idiotic law lal of or copyright was wa aa arr In ne nl flied d of revision and It I behooves behoove all authors author to 10 combine and acid in insist slit 11 upon unon uon such luch a revision reI n of oC that Shut law Ian lawas as would keep kep their property in thru own oln hands hand handsOn handOn handsOn On the tilO face fae of ot It I It I would sw sum seem m that Rita makes out OUI a good Rood cute case for tor the lIce granting of A 1 copyright In titles title But Hut there Is another aspect of ot the question en which when whon considered will rill probably deter welt well known knowlI authors from rom t I me to 10 her appeal to Join her h r i j takIng some seams tops stops to amend this vi 1 ci serious wrong ronK Such a copyright would I apply equally etl u I I to the works of ot all au authors authors thors of established reputation Amid Aid |
