| Show I BUSINESS m I IN DISTRICT CO COURT 1 Damage Suit of Wardle vs Hoag Dismissed to be Reentered Re entered For SERIOUS RUNAWAY MISHAP I Four Tour r CI Thrilling j ool oC if cl er Sens t Ii i 1 B 11 July 9 In tho the damage suit cult rt et f ile vs 11 Hoag Judge How Howell ell ellid i id d 1 the n ii of oC Attorney Nathan j 11 I TIB In ht behalf of or l J n I di tho suit null brought to recover N oM damages otI od to be he due fol Coi lel lul ad Injury received by b Wardle a ajOr dyer jOr and another complaint asking A fa f 1 In the urn sum of oC and rom mats of suit Mutt is to be fled today against Ir host Hoag tic lit II nea 1 complaint sets eta forth that jun Jum 1 I 1906 1905 yang oung Wardle was wall ns riding a L i K nn on a hay hi rake In the barr let and sons ns about to turn Into n 1 KM gate and enter a Held field when Mr fir r I tam ain In along tho road with his t I at n rapid rate of or speed that t u lit ho he footed tooted the auto horn and dash r rI between tho the horn the tho toy boy 00 was W riving rising and anI the fence flIe causing the horse to run lIn an away awn and Wardlo was thrown throw at a H a barb wire fence which lacer u e i lu his hands hand arms and other parts parta i r his body bod causing serious and p I per r ri i ment Injury necessitating tho the am j LI it Ion ion of oC one of oC his Ills lingers fingers The Thi f vet i t l fan Mau wales waa dl dismissal ul 1 because the In j P i s 8 have har hR proven proton more serious that ere trl at nt first thought and ami his attorney ought t its hI was van entitled l to lilt MIP for tor forin formale male in io damages Mr Ir Hoag Is cashier ot or orIll tale Ill Utah National bank |