| Show J DAUGHTERS OF PIONEERS i TO HAVE UNIQUE PROGRAM I 1 t I 01 the Ih ln tn t salt II t L re J the Ih annual meeting day II of III tv tha nl y r I l Daughter u of 0 th the Pioneers an and anda I Y Yi i 1 th Ih the ladles l dle are re preparing a HO pru 1 u X r rf a X 1 gram out of nf the lite ordinary to eels cle cleA f A I brat brate th the The pro pru r rt 5 f f t i pram gram po poI m this thil year yer M will come off olt at t 1 2 V I I raider raiders park at i l In th I the h 1 afternoon A anique a feature will Y Yi i iI I y 1 i be the appearance Af of o all the Ih la Ii laX X 1 ales iH tn In I calico alI o dresses 8 and sun tun suni X j i bonnets bonnet slier alter aU the fashion Chlon of ot th I Iria the v X days da ria hn ahen the tIN pioneers pioneer X i iI j I 1 th the III Another feature will willbe i ibe be 1140 th the program nf of exercise j 1 which will Include addressee iron i ii i ij i j several peral verll people among j I 1 them Mr Ids At AP Arnath nath I to Adam Adams w wh hJ h hy X y will II talk on m I Theatrical j i jJ if J f tt who will speak p k kon X XV V i on Pi and andi i iX X i Ir J Joe Joseph b F r Smith Wh J X 1 addres will Ill l be How flow On Otte Wi l lX y yoa X 1 ow oa o Cro d s the Plain Main Suitable X c 1 j musk muli will be i rendered d under h ne X 1 beautiful hadj tr Ir trees a of the mk talk Ik X 1 Y md nd 1 th the public Is Invited to at aty ata X y a tend In t wH w r j IlIr 1 Mr Adams will accept the th UK pug u Mention made mad to III him regarding re c th Ibl the bill He lie II a t that Mr Wr Adams Adam In each CAW case stated that he would accept th the alterations alteration i proposed ropo d These changes Include the tile f of I the court review proposition proportion and a other alterations alteration In the Ih opinion of n tha IhA president the tesi changes change would milk make th Ihl the house noun commute committee wl HN aN coi good ItI il an tilt th the amend amendment ment nl The Th president nl adds add a 1101 that lie hf liel heit it II l iv not t concerned about bout the tho language of r f the amendment but bill with th the a ai ae see i of 01 th the object In view le If a R h and rigid and not a Po chant Inspection T S J Pollo Following Ini li is the lent text of th the rest dents letter to chairman The Th T White Houie lou e Va ton D DC De DJune C e June U Ii 1 U M Ity I My lr Dar l Dar I r Mr In the tuft fist IH I wIsh promptly U to tb tM the one In ne of oC your jour letter In y you OU are re in th the main right I was wasn U UIn In n error In tn the th III statement which I ae f from Senator Of that there v wu III no provision for or snaking the plants II flU at III nil Mil hour houra to the In lu lun Hector n tora The Th provision WM was put lUI In In I another place tot but It 1 In is not as sa Rood good I AI III AIth I th the original orl provision The pro Iro provision provision vision is I t th the on nn one to 10 which 1 I most mol oh although tJ by y no nn means mean the 1111 01 only oie III I to tl which I 1 object it II Is it one lilt o oman oman of man roan A As AI regatta till this I wl wish h to 11 r to rf topeat peat that thai If deliberately to 10 prevent the till remedying of the tha evils come com complained plaited of tJI this thU I is the Ih ex a at prevision which th Ih th the Mends friend nl of n Ih t the h pokers packer am and the Ih picker packers themselves would mould have pro Iro tided Idd It If It absurd to In art assert Ih any such uch provision t is II needed 1 Why Yh have hate h you nu fIU not nol put PUI such uch a pm n In tn the III law a II as It II affects fraud order In Ih lb t law kw III a as II It II affect rt fraudulent en n trio trie of homesteads etc ftc Con r cannot take away y the th MIn eon eight rl ht of or the packer or of an anon any anyone n non on one el 11 else to the protection n of th Ih the courts court Rut Rul such uch a provision a iii as that Ihal under fin eon fines doe tint not represent a desire to 10 secure the t e C l right rights of ot oty any ny y man It II nt doubt doubtless 5 In some om rase an n h honest n t though wholly mistaken tinn In other eases It represents a deliberate purpose to 10 In Interfere 1 with Ith administration by II trying to provide that th Ih the courts court l shall chill chillIn shallin I In reality r lIt do e work lIrk which thy they Ihl would b tIC be the dm fiat to a avert rt rl Inability to 10 perform sous ROUE OBJECTIONS Nil If the bill a as you flU reported It from th the committee were w enacted naIM Into law la laOU you ou would have th I the functions function of 01 the secretary II of ot agriculture narrowly urn lim limited tied to so M as to 10 be purely ministerial and when be declared a II given slaughter slaughterhouse house hour unsanitary or a Rhen RII n product unwholesome acting on th the judgment of 01 th the government experts expert you ou 01 would put rut on the th judge who Nho 1 hll had hd no knowl know knowledge edge whatever hatt r of oC the Ih conditions the Ibe burden of oC Mating illig whether or not the was waa right In Chicago for lor Instance you ou would make any An judge e whom the th parker pa her hoo hones to III designate and not th the experts of II the department of agriculture th the man to 10 decide on onn any n question of C an kind which the thought It worth while 1 to 10 die dh put pule You Tou ma mil may io f IM remember rc the recent nl judicial ded lon In Chicago In which the pae were U concerned I with wish to repeat t that this provision I II In mv my m judgment on III one which If It enacted ft CI tJ Into law will III nullify th the major maor part of 01 th t the h good which rn b bf be 11 from the enactment of 01 this law Iw You inert assert 1151 tint that Ih ilk packer Insist nUl upon having a 11 rigid inspection law I passed d If they th I y r rIn In desire Iff a rigid ln inspection law IIA the tM they will Ill III ln In insist lt upon this thi provision be 11 Inc In taken out l ea It In I is In compatible with securing a properly lent nl law 1111 lawAS lawAS AS 1 TO To lo ao 10 o much of 01 your loiter letter I a as sp a of 01 my m having bavin made m Innuendo shoal about l sous of 01 th the houses houe or of your k l lod edge od of ot th Ih the Un language iMp etc ftC n tt la is lanot I Inot not to make any ny nr 11 Toss TOIl state late that If I or my advisers d will point out wherein w n th tit the bill tales fell fUsto to my m purpose it tt lIt U N promptly I Im am happy to 10 toll tell you rou nu that I have hav tody today seen n a member of fit your our commute committee Mr Adams Admi teeing seeing Mm him tal I by h request 1 of or the and 1 I wont went nl or over with lIh him together with Ith Mr lr M Of Mabe abe and Mr dr It Reynolds nold th Ih the arlou point points I In tn which the I he bill an ss you ou hate h hit I n tI ported It falls fall 11 to accomplish our ur pin pur purpose po pose 1011 and nude mid the Ih pacific specific i In each es eh ch rase ca to in I Ithe the Ih failure allure and In each h ce ease r Mr Ir Adams Adam stated Mated Hille that he r in al fi t th the alteration we proposed pro H lie Ife ago with Uh me ml that the court rev review low prop rhino should be hf excluded Ho II If agree a as to 10 th the dozen don other china changes hn which Wit we think should be made mide If It th these changes which w high Mr r Adam io says he h think should hout b hi he adopted ad are at adopted adopt your our it ment wilt will become III as rood good MS IOS the b Idge am Mr Ir opinion som ahat better then than th h he amendment rr if t unchanged ecI WANT RANT 1 I care car rt not a whit for Cor the language I e ethl of f the amendment What 1 I am Rift c n with U Is to have bAn It II the et etI I t have har hl e in M 1 ler w nam namely ly a thorough and aM its rigId W net A R sham i h m Inspection In my judgment the Ibl amendment a u as b h by o i falls falU to this object Hh wh rea t a the Ihl ll amendment II III 11 I and the Ih house amendment with lIh th the hm w which Mr Adams hi h has stated mated he ht will gladly irrupt accept lath holh l oth the O I leave hu In view I I I 1 will accordingly gladly Ie ace c opt either eliher or accept any an alteration ln of either r or of f bath which will ac Ie Mm this end and nd Signed Sl nl Yo fours r truly lion Hon James Jame chairman on agriculture TO MEET I ET TS VIEWS June 18 I An effort I is III to In b be toads mad today by bv members r of o the llIe hou house committee on agriculture who th the majority report for tor the lb hou house uh for tor th I the Beveridge treat meat me ln I Inspection amendment to 10 make rentals certain modification In the substitute Intended tn to meet the th objection n of 1 to tn that m rMA measure FUre f hll e Adam do donot sines not feel fel at al liberty lo to make public the which were noted by the Ih president he h rays they contemplate th the elimination Ion of 01 th the court Murl review provision The tout rest I I I is II to 10 remain a sa II provided In the Ih lo to be lIf paid by b th the government with Ith tit Us po Ity It II that IMI the lpt llon made mad by br Mr Cowan loan representing III Texas Texan rattle cattle rats rain rahMI er r MI may mar be dd to tn th list provision This Thic suggestion w was a that thaI a certain Hum auto IIA he It appropriated tp each wll year vear and spent for far the IIII In If Jf this thU th um sum should hould prove Inadequate th the e of pt age g 1 I is then Ihn to lets lety If in an n aae auer meat on th till the rattle cattle killed to meet m 1 the additional cost COlt Th The waiving th the llie ch civil MI II tre is III also alo eliminated There are an Mr I r Adam Adams said ald several veral I other for minor M which w will Im b be considered The Th nt pUa l is lo to bring the meat ml inspection In hill bill Into th Ih the house houe hou for con In Tuesday |
