| Show DECISION FOR rOU OR DEFENDANT II 1 A cUon l 11 Iut i t UN lilt 1 Suit lil A IJ In luu II favor Ir Of if defendant fe 11 I I I I Itin II lit tin rate Ee ur if 11 ii I A Nelson ol ul the th Il finch company C lu rendered 3 by Judge The action act ion wan 11 as Inc t I i I 1 to 10 t a recover tin hit I value of n ut cb In III Inthe IIII the he I I defendant u it tin which he it h c damned claimed vin 11 tN ti tl t tito KH ito I own 10 by ht hI the Ihl defendant The hp C tl claimed CI It I thai I tin t the t hi e et net IIII duly and autol 11 gal Hold so td tu lt ry an alt 11 e i levIed leed It hi was Wil nut nol t ti lv li l It I Itt t l uj liv I Iu l til Ih It th the Iho u Mm 11 was waa Judge however held that he h 1 was Wall WI perfectly regular legal I and hnot rendered r lder a Mellon In II favor of oC de ole defendant c III |