Deseret Evening News | 1903-11-21 | Page 2 | Utah Artists File an Answer

UTAH UTH ARTI ARTISTS T FILE AN ANSWER The In the CIP case ot of T Edwin I and J 1 ii B time Utah Art AIt Institute 0 l 1 Ottinger S B 1 1 1 W V Sloan M 1 horn Allan I H 11 I 1 A Aulmer ulmer dot I A i 1011 flied their answer to tim tha lii In the Ils the court today In iii which they changes tl II ti Te In I a with Ihl I imo mutt heM In this lisle cl city Irons Mardi 9 0 to D 1903 The l that 1 anti 1 Fairbanks mind Alce Alice l I ibm to 10 hi bl the ex cx exhIbition lt of the at to hold huld 11 an nit 01 Oil the date hut hul deisy that the above percents ever duly dillY up op pointed as luch such are nol lion dimly I it Is IB al also o admit admitted ted Ihal lie plaintiffs each ellch offered two In iii tom fOI the prize or of 30 MO but bul I it Is denied that the they sere wera d hy by the cor coin 1 I tel or lint tho they vere lie the onlY for fOI the prIze mn our It la is on that lit at onto ono other IH offered which WIS worthy If of competition but bul the majority lt of the tho corn the two re refused fused to 10 t suhl to 10 be en ant fur of aT preventing n a dr mind open competition mere merely ly Iy lu 10 own interests they selected only their own paIntings for exhibition to tho exclusion llIn 01 of others The admit that the judges judes till the offered anti II o tue tho one re no fused by the alleged cons com Ol Ild to mn make ka 11 nit n award of the tho prize for the tho reason that the tho ox ex exhibition committee acted without all aim In thc lie inciter und and the attempt el selections not Ind open I iy Ild and for the tho further reason that 1010 of the selections were worthy worth of tue tho prize 1110 thul were wro from from on thin the 1111 saul tee by reason of interest II lit the tho exhibit exhibited ed cd Fite len that I It II is the Intention 10 I hold C a s second because time do not recognize the exhibit ns an II ft legal one tho me prO iosel exhibit to he be hold hoid 1111 this month Is tile the nut first of time the institute oak ask that thul 10 be 1111 anti they ho be awarded their costs lii In lie actIon