| Show sm I VS S lOSS Court ral lolI or of In III t MI Time The supreme today handed down an u the Inn of at Judge McCarty ot of the Sixth dust met lIt lItIn metIn In the case CAIO of the Annie Laurie Mining I vs VI the tho HOAR Mining and Mill In log appellant action OO brought to recover damages for lor Injuries to lu a flume constructed by reo re company o 0 water waler to tolIa toIto Ito lIa loller at its mill rolli It au charged that appellant company negligently meke and other lie do dobrie brie said thereby break breall lag it Il so no thAt It IL would not carry water waler walerA A restraIning order was by the lower court to prevent appellant ruin to 0 roll rocks on time the flume anti upon Ullon thu tho hearIng awarded In the sum Rum ot of S 1850 company claimed that the was wall built hullt on Its hut but time the court decreed that It was built on Annie LaurIe round ground and quieted the title to the said ground upon which It I Is constructed In tho ho Annie Laurie company Justice Bartch the tho opinion of court today which nt at drums the tho or of time lower loner court JUHliN n tJ pl 1 Judge Hart con In the opinion |