Show rUB VAS Booth Actions II liti hu n it I 01 0 Booth this morn Ini Ing n a decisIon In the separate stilt ot of Mary Iary Caroline vs 1 ItI c which has hns been In court for tor several oral months un and hus attention by reaton of tic fondants that thai his hIli marriage with Plaintiff WOO waR II 11 plural otti onu IIII amod foie ore alit hl ivits 1101 entitled to relIct rollet nil as II w to ICe rho Ott is 18 to th effect that tie de hy by ot or his hiM anti his In out oUI plaintiff all as alla asa a kal l I denying ns as such that for Cor the pur osti ost o of deciding tito rights or of the par les leR to the case Is the legal of the tue It Tt is I decreed that shah shaU the Plaintiff with It 1 18 18 he month for Cor her anti nit all o SLOG for at tees fees rutis Is In 10 fl 1 to the already anti e Iut J by Mary Ann defend 11 hitS fa oth other r wife and the court Is IR of oC the that such urh valid con Vt 0 |