Show BEAVER BEA VER CITY LIGHT COURT CALENDAR THO wo nul that Must lItt Iny Il IlI Court lees Special Correspondence Corre Heaver Beaver City CI Heaver Beaver elVer Co el Feb Fel 3 and District Attorney torey Melville lello came hero litro CIC last Wednesday an have havi hn bean holding court SInce Ing today tolay There Is JI little R lucre here In the court nt itt lt this time and tho the rou roue routine tine 1 principally cOnfIned to probate matters maters Datlo flatin Karl I v vs 1 J Edwin I Earl Enri plain plaintiff plaintiff tiff wn wnM granted a I and IIII given the custody of or tho the children caste and ami 35 3 a n mouth month alimony on Oi the ground ut of if desertion and failure allure to Thy Tho hJ testifIed that the defendant was ol el 11 right tilt till 11 he ha got KOI to drinking and then thel ha he h left loft everything for tor whisky whisk Mabel was wan nl given KIvel a n of ot divorce against Benjamin K E J Hutch Hutchings InK ings on 01 the thu ground of ot failure to tC HUP Kul port According to the tha testimony fit fr t the tue witnesses in II the case caMe cale the defend defendant defendant ant al wn a n poor excuse o for far a 1 husband hUBband tutu when hen her hep child chilI was In born bor he de her and took that part of ot the tha furniture with wih him which he ho had hat fur Cur furnished furnished LITIGANTS TH MUST IA IA COURT COUnT COUnTI TEES FEES I EES IK U ABLE AULE The Tha tact fact was brought to Judge Ju ge r Woods attention that In nine nin cases caS filed since pineo the last regular term of or court hero here the tite parties partes bringing the suits nulls ull hail had hat Hied 1011 affidavits of at lt for or the tho PUt pur Ure pose pone of ot avoiding the payment pa lent of ot the In lo loRal Ingal gal Ral IRI costs of ot court In tome home instances of ot those these It WM was ns stated that the parties ero able ablo to pay such Buch CO Judge Green Greenwood Greenwood Greenwood wood said Bald that he wanted It that In nit nil such ca CM cases H I It have to tobe tobe tobe be shown to 10 t the satisfaction of tho th court that the llA parties 11 were In practically cally cI Indigent el cl cum betor they could avoid the payment of ot costs cosh by b taking laking this thi oath That the mere lucre showing allowing that thal such uch parties had no property exempt train from execution would not hot bo b deemed eeme but bUl that thata a 1 person who has hns any ny considerable amount of nt property or who Is II perfectly able to work would bo ho required to pay PI his hil own coats cotui In two of ot the tho casts cases CUSPS filed Under the tho pauper oath the tue court made mado orders citing the tito plaintiffs I to appear nail and show how further cause came why wh they tho not nol pay such euch costs COB Is |