Show SECTIONAL PilLARS 1 FOR STATE CAPITOl CAPlIn i Monoliths Are Voted by Cc Con COD mission as T Too o Ex Ex- c as pensive 1 Monolithic columns will m not bo ho hoin ug UI ugin in the colonnade of tho the new v Utah st sta Iti capitol the members of or the tho capit capi commission ha having voted to follow tl plans pf pt tho the architect and use tI columns When the question on of lisa lair ur monolithic columns was RI tho the commission the tho members member wel we about enl c evenly c divided i cd b ll jr monolithic and the sectional Tho Thu final vote ote b by a small J. J voted the time sectional columns rho Tho increased cost of or the monolith columns over tho the sectional provided pro for in tho original inal plans plana w outlined as the principal rC reason SOD for forti tl commissions commission's s 's ae action ion la last lait t ni night ht b br by Go William Spry The adoption of tl U monolithic columns he lip said taid would r suit in a lar largo large o additional r which tho state with could not nol bear j i Before Defore the final vote ote was taken j tho monolithic thic columns column letters fro iro prominent bu business men favoring orin t 11 II mOD monolithic column columns were read rad Mat Mai business men 11 had bail 1 written Jett letters to tl 1 commission ion asking that the bo he used d as it would ouM prove provo a groat greata rI a nJ feat feature urn for tIn tho state and gi the tho Utah building an attraction tion bo ho found in an am other oilier capitol in jn n I t United States Within a a- afew fey few days davs the capit capitol l. l roi r mission will is n a statement h hIt It its reasons for adopting th the section columns declared C. C 3 Tin eY I believe e the tho official stat m en t will fully jut the tb final Una Util of oi the commission ion While th tbd 5 ote vote r dose close the utmost barmon harmony harmony- prevailed tIme the meeting j i |