Show 1 i I r t I r Ii d TRAGIC TO fO STAY p I J t I I Court tass on Oil ory Spur t I l t J II ft U tJ W I df it 1 rise rhe court today J 1 e 1 jh I down nn an opinion In Iii the tao cane of or Amelia 1 i li I nt ot M nl vs s nio Hlo Yet West Westi ii I t u t 1 1 I II f i 1 i 1111 rn company and tho the An u II III I Ii j f J li II III heller up ap I II I jib I II 1 I fl In which the tho Judgment of at tho the thoI V lower court oUrt was Willi wu both and andI I It t I j i I I I I j reversed III In part The antion va vaIt C It t 1 I oj I i I brought In thin thIs county tu to t enjoin de tie defendants tieI JI J JI J I II I 1 from operating tin n over oer a 1 I tram from tho thA tIn Hlo western I ii 1 j 1 4 I 1 1 I track on nn I West street between 1 Bouth to tho thA U 1 1 1 1111 Sixth t 01 J J c fi The lower court I I ii granted tho tue Injunction on nn the tie ground lOuM I i I rl 1 if that It Interfiled Interfered with tho ho free freo ujo u c of at atI Ii property I to h for ter or orI I lP 11 phil j j we vero ID yero purposes I J iI I I U i II ordered to leIlO the spur pur track The Thus court the Judgment re reff f 1 Ii i supreme from froni ng ff I p 1 ears carM on Oil tho the leading hint the he 1 hut but orders that part VarL of ot the II 1 Judgment Mien ted de tie tieI I A i I 4 I fondant to tracks from tho the pub V Ji Ho lie street j v |