Show U ID STAff H If AN D 15 I l 1 Ih i s I t 4 i There Is Absolute Accord Between 1 Them in Respect Hespect to Nights of j 1 r Neutral Commerce J t i I I 1 HA HAYS VS DECLARATION nON INDORSED W 1 1 o J H HI r I I Minister at St In T iJ to Male Ma e a Formal f 1 I I II Protest I I I loj WAIT ON AMERICAN GOVERNMENT j J If I i M I l I 1 j I 1 I I IJ J 1 I I It I Is loped Hoped That It Will Wil Take to f f 1 Obtain un International Declaration 1 i 1 n ll Defining Neutrals Rights R U l f f 1 II London Aug 9 The he Associated Pr M learns that absolute rd ex ox jl fl It b the United Slates and hi Great In II to tG rights of ot I neutral commerce and all when tho dec deo r I of at e Hay Ha was published 1 II I the was lS In Informed I II formed thai It wn Will In II accord I j with wih the attitude of ot Great In 1 r t order orter that might understand 3 1 tho of the ald Amer American Aler t I ican views Lord downa directed f the British ambassador Rt at HI St oter il t L t thurl bur hurl to 10 against the tho Russian I j t I J 1 definition of ot contraband along tho ei mc 4 t lines Ilos as I the if 1 i Great n q 10 would Ilko the tho United States In tn Intake I I take Ilke In 11 obtain an International It declaration tol defining the rights of ot nou j t hut It li II not thought nt at the th for tor foreign t I I eign hero horo that e Hay Ua will wi do doso I U so 10 It I being understood there thero that hn 11 I II proposes to tn retain completes completa of ot 1 JI II i j II f fI IN I ACCORD Por nil 11 ex Ii I j 1 ii P i Ills the by bythe h on 11 IU the tho on Oi tho nf of Great lo to the United 1 r I nf ot the of or their thelt re I 11 I l In f 10 II f t i 11 I COUR I 1 It J With reference to tho constitution of or ofa I Ia f If a admiralty prize court at lt the t IO i V i lo to reconsider t the case CIO I 41 oL O the I f nw the 1111 f t he Bi j f t 1 tl St tl i r I In last night the aro Iro con I OI n It will wi reverse tho decision I r rot of ot tho prize court rOl nt Vladivostok They rhey that the roils Ion declaring steamer lo to bo a la Is not 1 I justified by h International liw I w and Ild that I j whatever tho ve Admiral A el had no 10 right to sink her J 1 I WONT 1 P I J Great 1 rot accept u eel 1 I merely IHly by Ly tho payment of ot u 1 II P monetary Indemnity hut hul that u I r 4 II I broad principle be IJ established l This Hussla Russia can Ol not admit admi at nt this mo moment 0 1 ment mOll In Jow nf of the finding of ot tho tha I but ut If tho new leW cout I declares le ns 11 the tho British government an al 4 that thai law did not lIol It 1 Justify the sinking at oC n neutral j I 1 then thol tho will wil bo ho of ot l 1 KI I easier fil Dm foreign 1 1 q hero here denies that there th re will wil be ref reference t I 1 l of ot the tho Commander ques question ues tion to 10 Tho Hague n bit ration court j i iIII and III It I In III a I matter for direct negotiation I I I between the Mo two j and 11 In II view of the tho j of nt both hoth to reach n U agreement M I II It I In 18 that n at act f I will bo br wi |