Show A I N I is I T WT WETS I Supreme Court ourt of the I United States States' Blasts I II La Last t HOl Hope of Forces Forces Opposed to to Ref Reform o rIll yiA Q w. w is J jie SUpreme court refused today to reconsider its decision o of last June 7 sustaining val validity d ty of the prohibition amendment i I and provisions of the enforcement i i act I The rhe rehearing had been asked ed in inI j I petitions b by Christian Feigenspan a aI ai i brewer of Newark N N. J. J and George I C. C Dempsey a a wholesale liquor dealer i of Boston Mass Rehearing of the Feigenspan case j was sought on the ground that the court failed to state the reason of its I i conclusion in holding the amendment Valid that inadequate time h had d been I allowed and that the courts court's construction construction construction con con- I II of the amendment relating I to concurrent power made congress congress' authority practically paramount and i II j nullified tho the effect intended by the j I senate ena te and house t I I I i I The Dempsey petition was based on I I the claim that neither the amendment i inor I Inor nor the enforcement act was Intended I I to prohibit the tho manufacture or sale I I I of beverages containing small quantities quan- quan J titles of alcohol where such beverages were n not t in fact intoxicating I |