| Show A it PROM We AVo cl piaO today to to n a letter leller from City III In reference to the latent lo o of et slander from that place In lifted upon uron Us till Sunday renders r neler by b n a naming contemporary r The rime writer of oC oCIO lio amo IO slander alander appears to b bC to bill bis signature to tile the absurditIes I It II contain contains And thus Chu shows that ht he has hai haia nuA a small modicum of ot goo enn which Is II otherwise Wo dId dia not Intend to 10 notice Mlles the ravings rovina of the Her ner aid correspondent further believing that thai they curry carry their on own refutation to who wh think ns nil well na as la read For Forthe tho the effusion lon embodies contradictions of ot veil Null known facts and amid relies rakes up tip Alleged occurrences of ot 40 o years yen ago ngo that never neer took place arni mixes them with cur cUre current current rent events and nd present falsehoods In uch ruch I it i wimy that It II Is a 11 mutter of great astonishment that n a reputable and widely idely circulated lell paper wilt will persist In tn publishing such person nl ni In their libellous character and Irrl Irritating tating to 10 a Q clue of ot Us Its readers who know kitow the thu malicious mixture lo tu ho be false falte It Is only wo we do 10 not wish to be discourteous to the gentleman who cigna lila hili name to lila Ills letter that thai we lIe havo Inserted It In tho timo News I anti mule these thele comments We to lo our friends In III City fly ly ant and older oilier county count many of have ox cx time the objectionable their displeasure ell nt at publications that boy th had 11 Il hotter holler either elthor lot let time the miserable defamer and his ht alone lOn or If they timY want to take lake any nn steps leps concerning them to 10 proceed through time the courts hut Dut after nil they tho are not obliged to lo loread read the Iho rubbish h nor harbor It In their homes |
