Show A f Dr UTAH C COMPANY MrA Y Montana Insurance Concerns Sc Se Secure cure Writ Against Local 11 Corporation Corvo ration WAS DOING MUCH BUSINESS Salt SnIt Lake Officials o I Make MallO Statement It U anti ami Will fight Tight Case to the End Helena Mont Juno 10 On the application cation of lit counsel representIng tho the gen len general eral crul f eight leading life lito mice atice companies operating o In Montana Uio tho ho OUrt dourt today Issued an al III writ tf tic i compelling Auditor JH J II rhel ll to re cc revoke revoke voke yoke the tho license of or a n life lito Insurance ant and Investment company of ot Bait l Lake ake or why bu hI hits bite hll not lone done so en soTh o oTh Th Th i writ was wan returnable Mon Moo Monday duty day It Ix i alleged III In the th application for Cor fortha tha ho writ that thIn the company cont any linK has IaH not IOL complied compile with the tho laws at ot a the tho r tuto and that thul the tho t to auditor who Is Iii the heath heal of ot the tho department d of ot o Insurance of ot the state Is unlawfully using u his hili to tn further tho thu of at tIm tho company It h ic I charged ll that Mr Ir Cal In itt IIII a stockholder I and of ot tho the Halt lako and at that as itt head lIend of ot tho thu Insurance department lepar of ot the te state elate ho hue hoe Issued I to that company a n cor certificate of or authority to do tie In Inthe inthe the state whim when ho Ito know knew that the tho Com coin Company pany lInn woe was not complying with tho the laws law of ot Montana It tt Is 18 alleged that Mr has n u letter mending hut that company which letter la is being used U M tot for advertising s ia to Auditor A tnt It or Cn Caid claims ci iii nu s hn bus po 10 knowledge of ot of law lall by hy the Halt Lake company Mr tr II Is II u a and WM IM IMel elected el state auditor on 11 the Vision lon four years Y ego ngo Counsel lIM o of th the Conti Continental company Is III undoubtedly tho tha II alluded to stated Hinted that the no ac action nolIon lIon ion them would bo be fought to 10 the last illicit ditch Not having neon ellI the thue papers PIP r and auth 11 having only Illy to 10 the tho effect that have blase been Instituted against us I cannot say city hat It II ii about sold lid Mr lr Pierce Hut wo 0 immune n IUn that tt It I Is I a it I charge churgo of o violating the tho laws lawn of or o Mon Montana mull tana and wo to are uro to win out nut Many MallY infill In havo 1110 In each state what l Is II termed tin In board This Thil board consists of or citizens alil 1111 they Ihy look hook nf tor the Interests of o the tha I Cr In II a way that cannot bo be dono lone by hy nonresidents Their compensation Is lii I us as lS u II I rule rul a 1 reduced 11 premium for or their own policies hut hilt It Is in perfectly legitimate rite Tho courts of or last retort rl ort In iii Io ftc tho of at hOl Island Indiana ind 11 Kentucky have all 11 held hell that It I In Innot i inot not Oft t I Violation of o the tho ho AUr law liw lawand anti and so SI has hns the auditor of or Mon Moil tana tauta The Tho only state that his has hll against our view Is U Michigan Wo We are ara Iro right anti and 11 we 0 will Hunt I r will wil go to IO to 10 lIght fight tho the action no in n soon Boon on as ns I r the nature of o oIt It ItI I l It Is U hinted In III tact fact quite qUil generally stood that the tho action against t th Continental Is the result r of ot it Is iq rail thin the company of 0 01 Ili HI bet M r Weil U is 11 president line like Ile worth or ot Lute buy lne s its ItH Ill organization n II t ago ngo fl and other oIlier companies fin a I vai t difference renco In their eltice IU I it debut debu I |