| Show IT It appears that tbt an Instructor at Yu Vu Yur r tw hu bad tie OM cour curate ot of attempting to Introduce all as innovation In the language of no mn email quence In a work on lor she nose the PO pronoun OUn It whenever she refer reten to lo II a person In the singular Just a as that OIt word ord la II used to refer f to a child there I Is no purpose to call n aten att n tI ties to sex The argument for tor this In I Is that If It t can oan stated fora tor small mU child ot of either sex x It ought I te tb be employed for lor IL a grown town up child 8 as well when It le la convenient to a pronoun that does not denote eat t mere mert should be bem to age limit to the use of oC 1 the ward It M to persons 1011 t It would appear rather strange to ft that wa way It oud as anomalous all as Joss the assertion that Jn n some laa words ord denoting woman o n are aN of neuter gender ender and caned called It But Dut on one gets geta accustomed to It 11 It was wa Kipling we belle believe who bo en endeavored n to add td to HI the language th the word human humn a es a noun denoting a human humn being th the same me as lb the Latin LaUn homo or German Jr It that U I adopted It would H be U the natural pronoun but It as a tut lute for tit Idl Idea ot of person penIO max mal not have much chance ot of T The English Ia R a wonderfully wealthy lan lall tUlle swage enriched from n nearly every rr source On 01 earth nut But there liter Me are still lUll Q a Qt t feta ideas tor which It lies lias no convent eel nt and adequate exp jon One OM ot of the most conspicuous of the there le II the between children ot of th the same Mme fatally for tor there Is Ie no other term than brother and though cognate cognat s do D not t lask lak the he on one word wont to express title the language Is growing and the defects will 11 lit be rem died In duo dUll Urn time |
