Show coti i In case Coso or of Sorab U Hoyle 8 Tb IU Court O I an opinion la ha th the ue of lall Sarah 1 Ii 11 Dole Dolea a appellant vs I Boyle BeIt reversing tb the Judgment of the court ourt below The record In th the ale casO shows that the appellant Sarah lIrah K l nol logic obtained a divorce from B Bo o r 10 tati 1197 and was awarded one of the rents and of a ocr r building III as alimonY On August QUit 1 10 1 lIPS DoI the hI hub husband conveyed the th Whole of the PI to 11 the defendent who ho refused to lo py pay ifrah E the the i proportion of the rents nd and awarded hr her b th the trial court Suit Bult was U brought fur for the recovery and a general t I the complaint wal Ih h court below gas anti and iii Ih refusing to amend the ho seten allon wag dIsmissed when th the plaintiff appealed Chief who wrote the thi Opinion that Mr Boyle Bole could rould to Jol no greater 11 t In th than hI he J pos nt 1 that Ihal to ho two 1 It I 11 alp hIrl that th 01 p I ral U r f at Ion stId 1111 th Ih thun un un 1011 is III till lit t l t I th h demurrer and aad In tb the decision |