Show f i J II I tH H t RE RECEIVER ElVER FOR FORr FORi t i p r r j i us t II 1 i I H r WALKER HOUSE HOUS 1 If i HI HII I J JI 1 f I I Ir l r t if i j Mrs Dudley Alleges Alle es Unprofitable b t Management of Business t I f i f d t t n ji 11 i i j jl If t l tt i TO ro 10 U l lI I 1 tl rt r rc It c 11 f I R j Widow ho of 01 tilt the Into Lul Hold notel Proprietor of or ort Al H HI r r LIt buc bucl fur Ir nn n I t 11 r I fain nt at the lito f I I I Ii 1 i l k I il I i Lilian Dudley tho the widow wl o of ot I H I i t tib of ot tho thu thul I Ii A Dudley Dudle and proprietress l j l I f Walker house today applied to JUdg I I Stewart Staart to appoint n a i receiver for the tho I J hotel I tar bar and billiard room Attorney r t 1 1 1 r James A Williams presented tho the mat matter i 1 t I J ter very fully tull to the court tho the fist first firstI I 1 thing thin after acter convening this morn 1 I I I as IS tho matter wouW take some con consideration I J I Judge tc J I Mr Sir Williams to postpone p further con conIL conI ib ibn 1 f r I C of ot the tho case e till III noon loon at nt which II time line he h appointed G L H n Lamb receiver 1 ri n 11 J I IL r Under tindel bond bondI t I 1 I 1 The T ease case Is s entitled Lilian Dudley l r 4 1 administratrix of ot tho tile estate of at Man I I f r 1 1 lIe A Dudley udley I deceased vs S I J I I Keith I and In her complaint Mrs Mr DUll Dud Dudley r fc roy Icy sets forth that her late husband I leaned the tho Walker house at a rental at ut utI ofES j ES a n month that although the least I fr r 1 i 1 hat had expired sorno time ago no It tt con contained V n a caus thai the th lessee should I If I r I I 1 bo be given sixty days daa notice before be lie being liei beI f I i iJ I ing ln reqUired inquired to vacate the premises It ItIs Itt t Jq 3 1 Is further alleged that on June Junt 29 2 when I I Mr M r Dudley was very cry ill til it Mr Keith sent r I I 1 his agents and attorneys to him with I 4 v 1 I a u threat or of attachment of ot all nil his goods I i I tJ 1 t I and chattels cha dud efforts effects elT unless he ho would t V I ji I t then thell and th execute ex cute a n note and chat clint chattel 1 1 i 1 I tel to secure eurl his rents his lila lilaI J I r of rent being then about I I 1 tl 1 j I I That mat the attorneys insisted Insl lM that tOO COO be bo L added to the Ihl amount of ot Indebtedness l 1 1 J an as I II attorney fe fc t s hut but t finally agreed u to toI tot II I t It 11 l 1 i 11 t i l strike this sUm stint Crom from the amount of ot ott oft t i i L i i anti the note noto and mort mart mortgage t 1 1 gage Ilg for to were cre thus thua executed 1 It I Ii Ii J toe due on remand That at ot the tiia name same time It j an agreement M S made with II H G O OI ClI I f I McMillan as the nent of David I i t II J by Which litch Mr Me McMillan lIlIan was wag a s authorized II J i p i to tn keepers In of or the bust busi business bustI I I k 1 J ness nee conducted in the he hotel to hi whom I t i a all nil receipts and anil nd expenditures were to be lie lieI I I f r A 1 I 1 t i 4 reported end and who should have t I to 10 tho books and registers and Rill andt Iii t t j A drawer oil vu demand at nt all nil times anti and antiI r I 1 i t I who should be allowed 3 n a day clay for ii 1 I c 4 d tho the decedent f u not lIot to 10 draw dral over oer JS 3 a R day for or his hIli hl own 1 I I i role u use useI c e eI I I The complaint then narrates that de do defendant doi I If i i 1 j I fi put In Attorney T 1 X 1 IJ Mitchell i Jt 1 If nn at keeper ko per and cashier to net let with th the Ic t f 11 1 decedent and anti that this consignment 1 I b k was continued from Juno June to Sept It l j it f during which time decedent ji J i t drew out only tar for lila Ills own use uc or I II 1 I 1 less than he was entitled to That i J IJ r at the time limo of Mr Dudleys death the I ii v 1 11 defendants agent told the plaintiff to togo toi i I go right ahead and run the t Ie Walker fl 1 i f hotel hote and bar until proper ar or arrangements 1 j s1 I ran could be ho made It being a n nI ai I i I l I i j busy time of at the year and amt the tho I Elks III f 1 I i tf rI if f r j carnival n That plaintiff I 1 I did AO io and continued to do do ito till Ull Oct J 11 l 2nd drawing 33 5 n a day and allowing 3 It II I I Z to accumulate tho ho same name an all a her hue hus husband hUAI I i I 1 I band which d dI defendants PIh lund bad done on day the de do doI I I g agent nent notified the clerks clerics not notto noti id i t 1 Il J J i to allow her to draw any further sums I h i I II f Plaintiff states that tho flue gross re to roo rooI toni ni I t H I 1 c of ot the hotel for July Jul AUg and andri ri j ill I r f f Fold were for far the tho bar hol bart holi t i I ii i Ji and from tho the billiard room II 1 ii r i J j I I i a n total of or n out of or which It l i I i tho the defendants d agent was only paid 1 I I i I M while 1765 would bo 10 due duo for tor forthe torl forI In I t l i the tie three months plaintiff believes that I 7 business Is III mismanaged 4 I I 4 tho the being grossly If 11 t It q aged find and at 01 a great loss to nil all parties I 1 I i and that she Is entitled 1 to have tho the thoI I 4 t I mortgage foreclosed d and nil all her h r goods goethe I I t I I antI and chattels sold at nt public auction be bet beI I r I I t that they will bring more moro than thant t I t s the amount duo for tor which they tho me nue I I II f I pledged ph 1 i Mr IAmb tie the receiver appointed by bythe b bIf byI If I j 1 the court to take charge of ot the HIP Walker 4 House Affairs until such euch time ns as tho the t foreclosure to closure can be lx l effected Was for tor formerly forI S j I i merly marty secretary anti and auditor of ot tho the 1 I 1 Nevada Central C Railroad III Ho has hns also if t r been lJ en cashier of or the th Nevada State Stalo bank bonk bankC t C I i t at a Austin anti and was nt at one on time n a di ill director t 4 j rector of ot the th fleck Deck Mining Muting com corn company comI r 4 I pany ran pan panr |