Salt Lake Telegram | 1915-03-17 | Page 9 | Measures Vetoed because of Errors

H URES VETOED BECAUSE OF 1 s ERRORS Is Made for fora Naming a Board of Experts rt reS s 5 for Cor or lh the veto o yesterday elter by byor byro Tt Te truer ro or r S spry pr of or two b r p b bof by tS to of or the thC legislature point to toof examination of or all al o of expert In either branch br ot of introduced bod Neither senate b body Cher CheT or house bill 13 h by Ill I'll JI b by Y 11 because aulie of or the kr in vetoed et l or h because the they lacked Nit hit because the they did not conc con corf- c JL to n C ar local legal thc they on on statute books hooks would wo h.-wo been InI InIc Ink In- In I Ic k th tIt the court courts In all alt proba- proba PJ Jute At t hill bill M U. U l. l l II I hex hn fixed lull a fee ree of for lh Ihl fling filing of or chattel monks monk's mort- mort k's ks l 10 lath offices of or count county recorders recorder u WI pro I that It was wan an amend amend- l i t 10 a AW 11 found In Iii the Compiled I riI n o of ot ISO It lt was wa found that th this thise on e of the COlli compiled Ja laws lawn WR had been Iree n nIn Led In 1803 1909 No o o reference to the thc a was made male In the Cher Chea I f d. d making the measure Imper- Imper 1 the cJ cac cate o of or house o bill b by the the bill had a ta faulty title till I Foti Board of Experts discussion In the senate a room one da during dunns the nes- nes ator I I. I n n. Wight of oC Summit IT expressed the opinion that t a n nm Minion ion of or expert attorneys should m to Hit sit during durin the session ts b legislature and pass pas upon all allU U Lt tx as u they went from the house I onate l or from rom tho ho senate to the i tat The experts would not consider I twits or faults In the subject t mat- mat lei TIlt would woul 1 simply examine Into fc technical l 1 construction of or tho the meas- meas I I K 11 to In make ke sure suro that It was wag I properly ro rl J a had he been n followed out MI the last legislature It Is probable I bills vetoed yesterday by Spry pry would I be going on tho eI In Instead of or representing useless Hi T. T thought and expense Miny Ian eon sen- 4 21 1 stoW iho heard rd Senator Wight's sug- sug Ost fx expressed favor toward towar It It and I some such suggestion may y myk k In n lull bill to be lie Intro 40 B it legislature I I f