Show I I t IS is m IDD mm WN IN IN INt RA DE ISION I t c f Unusual l Net Earnings H May MayI y N t Ind t sive NotI c Excessive I Rate f i I I Iw w WASHINGTON reb Eb b. b 28 k 28 8 X notable eJ pr principle was was laid laM dP down t today day by br the Interstate te omme commerce commission e flon In a decision de'- de' de dc- of C t case of the commis commissioners C of oJ I Jovi i i against J L ln Cen- Cen I dp v he ln rl f a. a The Ile net S Teve revenues o of 01 a a. a carrier have often an undoubted Important be beating bearing ring on the tho qU question of th the reasonableness reasonableness' of f Its rates but tho the fact that they are greater than the returns on ordinary business en IK If not sufficient In itself to justify Jus jus- a a. finding that the rates are execs execs- she l The value of the and other factors that enter into the construction of rates must also bo be taken into consid consid- cration In this ca cae e the complainant urged that a a. a fare tare of ot 30 cents charged by the defendant lines Unes for tor the transportation of ot passengers o er the bridge of or the Dun Dun- Dun 1 Dubuque Bridge company compan be between be be- tween or East st Dubuque In Il U- U and Dubuque la Ia was as excessive and discriminatory The commission h hOlds hold that the rate Is Isn n riot not t excessive whon when viewed from tram the standpoint of all ll the carriers participating ing in the traffic |