Show lIMITING EVIDENCE IN TI CASS CASES B BOISE ISE Ida Feb IS The The bars were I er placed against the government in inthe inthe the famous Kettenbach Dwyer Kettenbach-Kesler-Dwyer Kesler Dwyer timber fraud case late yesterday when Judge Frank S. S Dietrich curtailed the introduction of testimony supporting the rulings in the Wi Williamson and Biggs c case se in which it is held particularly in the former that evi evidence ence relative to final proof of entry is immaterial and has no bearing in any way on the present present pres pres- ent eat case or in other words that the motive of the applicant at the time of final anal proof is irrelevant This ruling of the court at so early a stage in the trial is considered o othe of the utmost importance by the counsel in attendance e at the case case as well as asa asa a Targe large number of attorneys who hap happened f 1 to be present in the court room roomI when hen it was rendered immediately following following fol fol- lowing lowin the argument by Peyton Gordon Gor Gor- I don for the prosecution and Attorney Tannahill of the defense on the tho objections o of the latter to the kind of evidence evi evi- evi evidence I dence that should be considered proper I for introduction It is claimed in government circles that hat a number of the witnesses have been tampered with although no DO charge f f this character has been openly made t is said laid it may be made in open court I. I R m I tempts were made today to show h f h t b it tt Jor Former ner District Attorney Buick Kuick tJ Jt A d threatened wit witnesses i |