Show cL i 1 I Reasonable or Safe I rii fl IME and nd again the tle supreme court of f the United States h has Ss said id 1 that every law passed by congress is IS presumed d to be valid J T. T if doubt exists such doubt must be reso resolved ved in 11 favor of the i. i t Y of the law and that that thata a a l law la v. v can prope properly l be be beheld held to to tobe be bej j 1 Invalid IJ lid only when its violation o of the constitution is is' i proved beyond fie Jr a reasonable doubt p. p t Away back ip in the early decisions of that co court it was stated but ut a decent respect di due eto to the the integrity and the I of the legislative legislative body ody b by which hicl any law is passed to presume me in m in favor of its Its validity until its violation of f the constitution tion n is ls proved d beyond a reasonable doubt f. y s. s More than half a century later that court saId Every pos- pos iL ibl ible ibie presumption is Jn in favor of th the validity of the statute t tute and this continues until the contrary i is shown l beyond a a rational ration l doubt ij AOne q branch of the government cannot encroach upon upon the domain f 4 le other otner without danger Th The safety of our in institutions institution depends U iY i small degree on the strict observance of this salutary rule Tule t Yet the overthrow of laws by a bare bar majority of o one e is bec beso be- be c ming so common as sc scarcely to attract attention i Four judges of the United St States tes supreme co court rl hold that it r that congress had the power to pa pass s a la law but ut if there thereOf rt i e Of a contrary opinion the law is killed I. I Would I any hy man of men outside of a court say that a conclusion was free k km from f m doubt or a cont contention was proved beyond a a- a r reasonable Z doubt if four men were one way and arid five the oth other r |