Show EXAMINES tIER MER OREGON I GAR HEAU Saunders Questioned Irant's sra ts t's Pass Facto Factory tt J. J S S. S Hearing t 4 Eo Sanders Sander one ona of ot the organ- organ t former fonner president of ot the Oregon Oregon- TarA r company was subjected to toross toross ross toss examination by Judge D D. v o counsel for tor tho Utah- Utah ar company l Y at the e federal l trade lid t today of the com com- n the Utah-Idaho Utah company Sugar company Ernest Ernesty y A. A P. P Cooper and E E. 1 F P. P CulI Cul- Cul conspiracy I to stifle individual rs engaged rs engaged in interstate corn com lUtah and Idaho jt s' s Straun StrauD a questioned the witness on his business activities rl in to going to the Grant Pass Pae Oregon on where ere the factory of at n was was- built and Je reasons sons for going to o Grants Grant's ts td ders rs declared that he had been of s selling securities and companies and that he hade halle had hall e el brokerage business He deLt dehe de- de Lt t he had prepared prepared the th Utah Sugary Sugar con com com- dented however In answer to toI I 1 put by Judge that lira ma n 11 going to Grants Grant's Pass was In ingists of the Gold Drift Mining of Grants Grant's Pass He declared affairs of the mining company ily to his trip r RESOURCES tramp brought out in the course that the terri terri- ent to Grants Grant's Pass is semiarid parts must b be irrigated Mr that the surrounding heavily forested it being esti- esti a mile hundred radius ot of of the standing timber of the theates theates ates is to be found Mr San- San declared that many mineral de- de e been found in the territory d however that the country for its Ifs timber and ands sources s ulc s stating stating- that to him It known 09 as a region of very di di- di resources of ot Mr Sanders lively tilt between Judge y Ward Beer special attorney deral trade commission Judge to the the- examiner that great difficulty in com com- 1 rf Sanders to answer his ques- ques an anSI thre threatened t ed to t. app P th the district court to secure secure an an- witness Mr M Beer warned the witness not to be intimidated by the th-s threats threats' of ot Judge ON ON STAND At Wednesdays Wednesday session session of ot the hearing John T A A. Hendrickson was again subjected subjected sub sub- to cross examination by Herbert R. R Macmillan counsel for tor the Amalgamated Amalgamated Amalgamated Amalga Amalga- mated company He again related much of the history of the West Cache Sugar company and was questioned on n matters connected with the case of ot the West Vest Cache company against Mr 11 H and Lorenzo N. N Stohl In which a judgment judgment Judg judg- ment for was Tendered rendered for the I plaintiffs i Mr Beer put the following question to Mr Stohl What did this Judgment of represent the net profits or the gross profits referred to on page 2192 of the records Will wm you explain that for forthe I the Ule record T witness witness- answered Now In an answer ewer to your question rela- rela I tive LV te tt the being net profit or gross profits my answer II Is this When the i judge had heard hear our case he notified I us us that he would take the following week the entire following week to look into Ino the case before he would render his de de' In the middle of the following week he be decided the case and nd so notified the attorneys and his decision was that we were agents fiduciaries When the judge had decided we were agents our attorney made a list of expenses outlays for labor for commissions and discounts the that We paid out of our jer- jer per personal er- er pockets during the two the two years of the promotion and construction construction- and a bill of oC about half halt the regulation commission for such work as we did These expenses to totaled totaled totaled to- to tens of thousands of dollars The entire amount totaled over Our attorneys presented those items to the Judge and asked that they might be permitted permitted permitted per per- to give evidence to show that these expenditures were correct and the commission asked for was extremely reasonable rea rea- The Judge declined to listen loany to lo any of our requests stating that If that was done he would be allowing two trials In one Hence we were not allowed a single dollar for tor all our outlay during those two years or or anything for our services r e AS l' l e u i t g Is the ta g gross profits the e between betwee the tho tho buying the and selling and net pet profits and I feel therefore that It Jt Is unfair and that the decision was absolutely absolutely absolutely unjust and will so go down Into the re record ord of of time Mr asked the witness why he had attacked some of the best citi zens of the state Mr Hendrickson re replied replied re- re plied that he had not attacked anyone except Mr Woolley and L. L R He Eccles He added that If Mr Macmillan Macmillan- referred to to Mr Woolley as one of the best citizens In Utah then God pity the rest In reply to questions put by Mr Macmillan Macmillan Macmillan Mac Mac- millan Mr Hendrickson disclaimed ill r responsibility for bringing the complaint on which the present hearing Is founded STOHL QUESTIONED Mr Stohl asso associate late of Mr Hendrickson Hendrick- Hendrick son 1 In the e West t Cache Sugar company Jug was also ls cross te e examined by Mr r. r Macmillan Mac Mac- I millan Mr Stohl testified that that Mr I Woolley had been the first to suggest t arbitration of the differences between himself and Mr Hendrickson and Mr Stohl Mr Dir S Stohl toh 1 testified that he went to see see former Governor William Spry i ian in inan In Inan an effort efort Jo to o have him compose the dif dlf- differences between Mr bir Woolley and Mr Hendrickson r Hl Mr Macmillan illan asked the witness witness' if If he that Hendrickson Hendrick I had told Governor Spry s son son n said that he w would take the ma matter t r I up with the federal trade commission and aril would involve the c cren church ad and the and the brethren breth breth- ren in an investigation This Mr j breth-j Stohl emphatically denied I II I |