Show JERSEY N GOVERNOR J i PLANS TO CONTEST wi i j PROHIBITION I I La Law i Attacked on Ground I States Did Not Not Ratify Same Resolution Ii r JERSEY CITY N N. J. J J. J J Jan Jan h 2 The The i distinction tl ri between alcoholic liquors 1 an and intoxicating liquors liquors' may figure prominently In an attempt to obtain revocation of Secretary of or State 4 Lansing's s proclamation of or ratification of the prohibition amendment according according accord accord- ing to a a a- a statement by Edward vard I I. I Edw Edwards Ed Ed- I. I w wards riis' riis who was elected gov governor of ot New Jersey on a wet platform Preliminary Investigation in Washington Washington Wash Wash- I ington is said to have disclosed that w J some of oC the ratifying state legislatures passed resolutions alcoholic liquors while the he resolutions of others read ti Intoxicating liquors If this is officially om- om Jf dally verified Edwards is expected to point JOint out to Lansing that the states 4 did not act upon the same resolution a and that ratification of the amendment amendment amend amend- m ment t is consequently u invalid a I I have been informed that g t the er erI errors er- er rocs In this case are sufficiently glaring glaring glaring glar glar- ing to warrant questioning the propriety propriety propriety pro pro- of issuing the proclamation I Edwards said The secretary of state can proclaim only facts If discrepancies discrepancies cl cies s exist the state of New Jersey will swill insist that the ratifications be bere re- re |