Show IS 18 Justice Kroeger Holds That Ho He Was Justified In Killing Holmes HoImes ChiN llOY WAS AS I 11 1111 r rI tic or of iii 1 I iid Inell I I th wt iut ur i II 1 1 I PO Pop cio 1 hn h Will W un on the related the of I II ut of Pay POY He ald thaI Joy Poy Joyt t ii thul thit th boys boYI had been bother h il ht hll took look a shot at thorn thom At AtI L I I 11 PC Jo ave hIm the thlu u 1 anI upon examination he heL heI L I fur cartridge and two evidence of Iw ot of them thiM bore I Io n r recently exploded Wit I s b bY Attorney It IC ItI t I I R 1 rrb h merits marka on the Ibe door lie 1 hiL were Hempel ilk Id tit Ihal j I 1101 hUn him he be heL beI I L II le he the Ibe only I I Is in III the hou Ift r U Hr r wal the Ui 4 Tb The China bIna ChinaI I d Il 01 hi tile II to the I tien about Ih the hou house I L II that a person pinon J II II 11 would have a clear I J n on the bridle bridge 1 th fence nee cud and could have I I In that L II described the to 10 toot L 1 ot th Ih Junet nd the course I tiu Ih hullet The slog entered I L I I J un n the right side I TI th Ih spine and Ind just below I 1 UnI ranged upwards and andI I t I J In ft Dr DrI I II fl Lid tl ki noticed a bullet hole holl holett tt un II tie Ille rIght side near the theli 1 li at ws pot In ID evidence n a t II the th lu location ot of lb the bullet hole holet be that O de Ot deO t 1 t tu to seen en O t II a III fl II i stooping for tor torI I I shun shot ith the thet t 1 t 11 r Pr ir Anderson the cu cuI I J t I oj J 1 O 0 1 P Pratt was placed tr rr the IM Mr I I thit h interviewed I J I i the and they I Lw that thai there Were some lOme thing 1 t h ht nt been told tol but their tea te tei I i UI nut nul b be changed because I U tI I I ot of getting into Inlo trouble Th 1 L U the Chinaman I 0 n fl l titer ler the trouble and found Coun l lIt It t fm r rn Ih battered condition or of the I at al least Iwen I I I h tTO thrown at 1101 the house houle 11 IllS the only witness for the IheI e I i hIs hll to t Ih case rale without 1 j 1 Hoera said laid he would like t I t I d as 1 to 10 Ib the of II II 1 rIll then stated U II ii 18 that II a crime had hadt 11 t I d It If mur murder er it II rt and azid a jury jur 1 th case caf I 1 gr r and made an ex cx ext t i I l argument on M I fl to l dUnK ease cates In inh 1 I I h lit h lI d rere 1111 l 1 not how the Ibe white while mill man s 5 t I IU III said Mr I 1 L I r f old mill man is II entitled I t p uC the la law III as much lu ju luI juti I ti h t and most mOlt Influential 1 U II III U ur lut lun I 1 lie He was wal assaulted I I I Ilk hh II tIt 1111 and 1 as al not required to tn t II the right whIch the Ibe III Ill I to force with force fl 11 I f th Ih nl ot of the taking laking of hUe hu hUeI j I i hf I iu say nothing of the dead dad dadI I II r I h t haM paid for tor hi crIme with I hJ hit that uhl IN I k Is lOt of no tt crime and ami Ik I ask kt It he b be 11 Attorney Gunter I I I I rI rR t r ro It pi to Mr r Rogers and andI I I 1 L II i r that Ihal It was a 1 1 tile the urt to a allow a jury Jur to toI I 11 1 t r ot of declaring II I k gull f or not hot ill tn up U the evidence Justice t t I 1 It N ml to 10 me that thaI I shows that the de des s near the hour of I I r that In more lre than Ihan one rock ti II r 1 j 1 hell believe eVe that when a I h In hi hIs bed and II I at I I nd r to k at al his hll door I 1 t I II thInk hilt hili life lite I h and I believe bellee he has hal n a J tl t an and 1 kill ot Of course It itt t th defendant I the I y r could take the matter t I 1 h t f ourt but bUI I do not nol feel teel II t i hid held and It is II th the or ord U d t that he bt be discharged I I j I I I Immediately sur lur r i 1 I hr e dozen chattering I 1 I I II ho him I 1 hippy and shook hook hand I II It h I r y i Idle mAn hI he 1 Ii U f the Chine Chinese delto t I U n U I its way Wy to 10 Plum A t j I the he to Ih the China t 1 U 1 t of the cu cae |