OCR Text |
Show lllrj T.w'erci on Supervisor Authority Ths t'Uh stats boarfe of equalisation and tiMitmrat kaa ! rqu sated ths attorney fensral to gtvm an opinion concerning tha I powers and authority of auper- rlftoro of drain; districts to charts; apportionments and bana-flts bana-flts and damaffea after such appor I tloamenta and dimifM hava bm .accepted and paeeed upon; also i iriiMMaaL m i mm if iini i mm tlon districts to chants tha allotments allot-ments of watar after such allotment allot-ment bars been finally passed upon and accepted, and tha power of boards of county com m last oners to m&iM any charts or adjustments adjust-ments in either of tha cases cited a bore. Aaaiatant Attorney Genera! Hilton, Hil-ton, to whom tha matter has been presented, baa heretofore 'rendered sn opinion regarding- drainage districts dis-tricts in which be held that boards of county commissioners should alt as a board of equalisation of drainage district taxes each year. w-"1 fVrt the 'QMwHrd rnftt assessment must be used as the baals of equalizing all district faxes, but a to an annual assessment assess-ment of benefits by the boards of supervisors In drainage districts he answered In tha negative). Am to tha other questions asVed by tha atata board of 'equalisation and assessment, he hold that the law of 1919, aa amended in 1921. 1 well and clearly defines the powers of boards of directors relating to the benefit assessments bn allot -mente of water, and that they are used as ' a baals la fixing tha tax l7f, . . - |