Show lUU CO OU OUT T Iel emo h was wa con In olt olty nearly Marly a year ao 00 which ln In clu ed the Iho of at the tho old spotters II m methods meth ds find and having tor ono one ot of its chief objects the exclusion ot of S SH H from hIs seat HIlt In Con hll has been alluded to several eral times time In tho those columns It leaked out early G In the prevent merent year oar that a criminal c ca n would be 00 entered In th the courts agaInst the but would be delayed t t unlit Just JURt previous to th the time lime for tor his departure for Washington 1 a number of t other cases against proms prom promInent meat wore were to be d a 60 00 lIS as to old aid In n the stork ot of stirrIng up 1 t I public 1 prejudice r agaInst the Mormon Church which twos char ed the tho nomination and find election ot of d a polygamist to represent represent tho State In Congress S I The dep departure ture of the Gentleman for tor fort torl t l the East s sooner oner than was b by the tho plotters somewhat disarranged theIr plans plane but nn an effort was made to tot toI t I accuse him of a felony felon so fO as to justify i his extradition and bring hIm here her for tor torI fori I i trial This part of o the scheme fell Cell through h for utter Otter lack ot of to tot t support the charge Next a complaint w as entered against hilt for tor a misdemeanor i meanor on which h he count not nol be bei i brought back tro from the East and his q 11 enemies proclaimed hIm a fugitive from Crom Justice or Of course his was very er soon Been roon through and had bad no lasting effect upon his 1119 cas case A gentleman belongIng to mho tho Meth t odist Church held Q a conversation with r a preacher or of that denomination who I was wal associated with the crusade whIle on tho railroad when the preacher confided con to him particulars or of orthe the s heme and the tho was J divulged by the former Carmer anti and published In Salt Lake papers paper The preacher however tried 1 la IQ creep out ou ot of the peal 1 lion In whIch he had placed himself l I ls letter on the subject was pub belied and lI replied to In the Deseret r es I We return to thIs subject for the rear rea r I son that to In the course of the gation before the special 1111 on I the Roberts Roberta L case B the facts were mado madol madoc I l c ap apparent and clearly established that It the plotters had desired simply to proS Cul Mr for tor alleged ylo 10 laton ot of the law they Could have done I Co 00 earl early In the year and without walt waltIng Ing until the time when were cre really C commenced d A were presented to bo be u used ed against the de fondant at the following dates datos Dy Dr Thomas J Brandon dud Hay flay T Bran Brun Bruni j i don bOth boar on Fob Feb lath 1599 b by Luella P 1 Mary E McDougall both bothon t on They were all drawn 0 up b by A T Schroeder l Without going any farther tarther into Inlo the tho evidence or the or scheme It if the tho persons engaged t d In It prefer to call calt U It Uso so 60 the dates of ct these are aro sur suf proof Thy They bear out the state statement statement ment published b by Mr Peel Peet and slab Ush that which was denied by his pious but not altogether reliable disputant Th The paltry methods resorted to by the clique who conspired against Mr Roberts and the Church ot of whIch lie L La 11 c n a ni member only to he be to tobe tobe be and b by all just and fair minded d people I 1 |