Show CASE OF EXTREASURER J rfg > Cherry DtcUM stout BMmn are Not UM Into Aimin1 it dlirlilitilr fill be Appointed 0 0 it b 411 Awpmtsa 4 let Th costs of Ml Ik Oily I agalnl ei my Tnoaunr John U May 1 and his txndimen John M Partly and U II Uctornlrk cam on for trial lifon Judge Cherry late ylrday aftrnoon naulllng In I ju Igmenl being rumored In t for of the defendant City llorney W C Hall and Aetlant City Allcnwy C II Hlwrl aptamnd for the plain fairIIiW = r lilt while the defendant win rprc Contend by Judge Marshall 1 > D Hemp Blend and Undaay structure On June 0 IM May whll nillng the rtlce of city inaeurer had on do limit in I the Hank of Halt Lak IIIMIM of the muilclollly fund 0 On that fafara tunole N ithhant day Hi bank failed Th clly then commence < l lull agalnit May and hit bondsman to mostor th full amount May claimed that he h1 I itioreleful l du car In dfpwlllng its city units In the bank mad that at the tlm the o < lt wo ma1 the bank was Im lleved lo be In a Unit I nnanrlal can lltlon still I thai he waa not therefore rwponll I for the cltya lo l My t bondmm act ut a similar Itt I It-t I llmlng that heir reeponilblllly rtily went no far aa to make goo th IOBBIB 1 by mbcialem or In case May ha I put the money In I an Inetltullon known lo lie In I a rat at In I Valley Evidence was Introduced rn how that the rcpulatl of the defunct hank he ton lie failure wa so No I offer which ariumento h more hll made I that neither May nor his auretle wen liable for the In 1 tr the r h1 Ili city filing near bad not deposited the money In I a bank know 10 be shaky twoltiffor had he embossing the fund The UII9 ahara of IH lIoR tit Lark atick lorethr with Iterand fine for IUM9M Offered by tlncon In Mill merge won Indicted turnott oar 10 Ill I city small An ppool will bit tok an 10 the ftprom Vourt |